From: Richard Curnow <Richard.Curnow@superh.com>
To: Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
arjanv@redhat.com, peterw@aurema.com, ak@muc.de
Subject: Re: finding out the value of HZ from userspace
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 17:22:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040316172224.GF17627@malvern.uk.w2k.superh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1079453698.2255.661.camel@cube>
* Albert Cahalan <albert@users.sourceforge.net> [2004-03-16]:
>
> Fortunately this is a fresh new reason to beg Linus for
> some data. (all previous arguments have been rejected)
> What would be useful for you?
>
> HZ (-1 for tickless?)
> USER_HZ
> freq_scale
> some boolean to indicate ppc-like (pure cycle counter) time
> ???
freq_scale would be a good starting point, I think.
However, there is worse. There is bounds checking on the txc.freq
argument to adjtimex(). IIRC the bounds have changed at various points
in the kernel history, but at one time the limit was +/- 100ppm. At the
time, I had a mobo with a -300ppm clock error. To cope with this,
chrony modifies txc.tick to take out the gross error as well as txc.freq
to adjust the fine error. Therefore, it needs some idea of how tick and
freq inter-relate, and what the valid range of values for tick is. This
is another mess. I need to go away and think some more to know info
from the kernel side would make the problem easier to code for, though.
--
Richard \\\ SH-4/SH-5 Core & Debug Architect
Curnow \\\ SuperH (UK) Ltd, Bristol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-03-16 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-16 16:14 Albert Cahalan
2004-03-16 17:22 ` Richard Curnow [this message]
2004-03-20 9:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-20 14:54 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-03-20 23:58 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-31 21:40 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-03-31 23:46 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-04-01 15:54 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-01 16:01 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-04-01 16:30 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-01 16:50 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-04-01 17:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-01 21:27 ` Michael Buesch
2004-04-02 0:16 ` Peter Williams
2004-04-02 0:07 ` Peter Williams
2004-04-02 0:39 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 1:44 ` Peter Williams
2004-04-02 18:28 ` Tim Bird
2004-04-02 22:05 ` Peter Williams
2004-04-01 16:12 ` Albert Cahalan
[not found] <1zkOe-Uc-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1zl7M-1eJ-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1zn9p-3mW-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1znj5-3wM-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1AaWr-655-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-16 2:27 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-16 5:53 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-16 6:16 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-16 23:15 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-16 23:56 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-17 0:15 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-16 9:16 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-03-16 23:45 ` Peter Williams
[not found] <michf@post.tau.ac.il>
2004-03-11 14:17 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-13 17:24 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-13 19:34 ` John Reiser
2004-03-13 19:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-13 22:14 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-13 22:32 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-14 1:05 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-14 1:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-14 14:37 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-16 0:28 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-16 6:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-16 23:38 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-20 10:22 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-20 11:28 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-20 11:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-20 23:58 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-21 1:09 ` Tim Schmielau
2004-03-21 1:30 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-21 8:00 ` Kai Henningsen
2004-03-21 10:32 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2004-03-22 22:34 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-22 23:04 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-25 17:40 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-25 23:22 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-27 13:31 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-27 23:52 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-28 12:16 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-27 21:11 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-20 23:26 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-13 21:19 ` tabris
2004-03-13 22:10 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-13 22:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-03-14 1:07 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-14 18:26 ` John Reiser
2004-03-14 2:45 ` Horst von Brand
2004-03-14 14:39 ` Micha Feigin
2004-03-15 8:17 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-03-16 18:16 ` Mark Gross
2004-03-15 10:13 ` Richard Curnow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040316172224.GF17627@malvern.uk.w2k.superh.com \
--to=richard.curnow@superh.com \
--cc=ak@muc.de \
--cc=albert@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterw@aurema.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®