mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor_core@ameritech.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Kim Holviala <kim@holviala.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mousedev: Fix scrollwheel thingy on IBM ScrollPoint mice
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 01:29:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200410270129.49255.dtor_core@ameritech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041027055059.GB1211@ucw.cz>

On Wednesday 27 October 2004 12:51 am, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 07:33:50PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> 
> > > > This patch limits the scroll wheel movements to be either +1 or -1 on
> > > > the event -> emulated PS/2 level. I chose to implement it there because
> > > > mousedev emulates Microsoft mice but the real ones almoust never return
> > > > a bigger value than 1 (or -1).
> > > > ...
> > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_WHEELFIX
> > > > +				if (value) { value = (value < 0 ? -1 : 1); }
> > > > +#endif /* CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV_WHEELFIX */
> > > 
> > > This is really not a thing which we can put behind compile-time config.
> > > 
> > > Can we come up with a fix which works correctly on all hardware?  If not,
> > > this workaround will need to be enabled by some sort of runtime detection.
> > > 
> > 
> > Unless someone (Vojtech?) has an objection I think we should always have
> > this workaround activated - after all mousedev provides legacy emulation
> > mostly for XFree/XOrg benefit anyway. Clients accessing data through evdev
> > will see the full picture regardless.
>  
> We can have a workaround for XOrg, but not one like this. This will make
> fast scrolling unreliable. I have standard Microsoft-compatible mice
> which do report more than one scroll tick per report, if you scroll the
> wheel fast enough, and this throws away the extra ticks.
> 
> We would have to split the value into multiple events which would each
> report a 1 or -1.
> 

I have taken a look at XFree/XOrg sources and it seems that they should
not have -1/1 problem but values outside of limits allowed for Intellimouse
or Explorer protocols will cause re-evaluation of protocol mode. We probably
just clamp values to protocol limits (-8/+7 for intellimouse and explorer
modes) and be done with it.

-- 
Dmitry

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-27  6:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-26  8:45 Kim Holviala
2004-10-27  0:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-27  0:33   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2004-10-27  5:51     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-10-27  6:29       ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
2004-10-27  6:32       ` Kim Holviala
2004-10-28 12:42         ` Kim Holviala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200410270129.49255.dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --to=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kim@holviala.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vojtech@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome