From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
"Mark F. Haigh" <Mark.Haigh@SpirentCom.COM>,
linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:28:46 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050209112846.A24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502091223310.5842@goblin.wat.veritas.com>; from hugh@veritas.com on Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:30:24PM +0000
* Hugh Dickins (hugh@veritas.com) wrote:
> dup_mmap's charge starts out at 0 and gets added to each time around
> the loop through vmas; if security_vm_enough_memory fails at any point
> in that loop, we need to vm_unacct_memory the charge already accumulated.
If that's the requirement, then it's broken as is, because there is
nothing accumulating. len is re-determined each pass, and charge is
reset each pass. But I think that it's ok, as we only care about the
last pass. If dup_mmap() fails part way through, the cleanup path should
call unaccount for the (potentially) accounted by not fully setup vma then
call exit_mmap() and clear all the vmas that got accounted for already.
Either way, Mark's patch is not needed, and I don't think anything needs
patching in this area. Hugh, do you agree?
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-09 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-09 3:51 Mark F. Haigh
2005-02-09 7:04 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-09 12:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-09 19:28 ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-02-09 19:46 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-09 20:04 ` Mark F. Haigh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-09 3:48 Mark F. Haigh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050209112846.A24171@build.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=Mark.Haigh@SpirentCom.COM \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®