mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>,
	"Mark F. Haigh" <Mark.Haigh@SpirentCom.COM>,
	linux-security-module@wirex.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: VM accounting bugfix (2.6.11-rc3-bk5)
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:28:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050209112846.A24171@build.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0502091223310.5842@goblin.wat.veritas.com>; from hugh@veritas.com on Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 12:30:24PM +0000

* Hugh Dickins (hugh@veritas.com) wrote:
> dup_mmap's charge starts out at 0 and gets added to each time around
> the loop through vmas; if security_vm_enough_memory fails at any point
> in that loop, we need to vm_unacct_memory the charge already accumulated.

If that's the requirement, then it's broken as is, because there is
nothing accumulating.  len is re-determined each pass, and charge is
reset each pass.  But I think that it's ok, as we only care about the
last pass.  If dup_mmap() fails part way through, the cleanup path should
call unaccount for the (potentially) accounted by not fully setup vma then
call exit_mmap() and clear all the vmas that got accounted for already.
Either way, Mark's patch is not needed, and I don't think anything needs
patching in this area.  Hugh, do you agree?

thanks,
-chris
-- 
Linux Security Modules     http://lsm.immunix.org     http://lsm.bkbits.net

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-09 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-09  3:51 Mark F. Haigh
2005-02-09  7:04 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-09 12:30   ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-09 19:28     ` Chris Wright [this message]
2005-02-09 19:46       ` Hugh Dickins
2005-02-09 20:04   ` Mark F. Haigh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-09  3:48 Mark F. Haigh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050209112846.A24171@build.pdx.osdl.net \
    --to=chrisw@osdl.org \
    --cc=Mark.Haigh@SpirentCom.COM \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@wirex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®