* eepro100 or e100
@ 2005-02-18 19:01 Maciej Soltysiak
2005-02-18 19:09 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Soltysiak @ 2005-02-18 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hello,
Can anyone shed some light upon the state of development
of these drivers?
I mean: the set of supported both NIC and kernel features.
Are both drivers supported by their authors, etc.
Looking for answers that would lead to a conclusion which to use.
Regards,
Maciej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: eepro100 or e100
2005-02-18 19:01 eepro100 or e100 Maciej Soltysiak
@ 2005-02-18 19:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-18 19:49 ` Re[2]: " Maciej Soltysiak
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2005-02-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Maciej Soltysiak; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 08:01:11PM +0100, Maciej Soltysiak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can anyone shed some light upon the state of development
> of these drivers?
> I mean: the set of supported both NIC and kernel features.
> Are both drivers supported by their authors, etc.
eepro100 is unmaintained and going away.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-02-18 19:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-02-18 19:01 eepro100 or e100 Maciej Soltysiak
2005-02-18 19:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-18 19:49 ` Re[2]: " Maciej Soltysiak
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®