From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, sct@redhat.com,
janetinc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: OOM problems on 2.6.12-rc1 with many fsx tests
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:33:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050404133333.79fd9d93.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37420000.1112646263@flay>
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > I run into OOM problem again on 2.6.12-rc1. I run some(20) fsx tests on
> >> > > 2.6.12-rc1 kernel(and 2.6.11-mm4) on ext3 filesystem, after about 10
> >> > > hours the system hit OOM, and OOM keep killing processes one by one. I
> >> > > could reproduce this problem very constantly on a 2 way PIII 700MHZ with
> >> > > 512MB RAM. Also the problem could be reproduced on running the same test
> >> > > on reiser fs.
> >> > >
> >> > > The fsx command is:
> >> > >
> >> > > ./fsx -c 10 -n -r 4096 -w 4096 /mnt/test/foo1 &
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > This ext3 bug goes all the way back to 2.6.6.
> >>
> >> > I don't know yet why you saw problems with reiser3 and I'm pretty sure I
> >> > saw problems with ext2. More testing is needed there.
> >> >
> >>
> >> We (Janet and I) are chasing this bug as well. Janet is able to
> >> reproduce this bug on 2.6.9 but I can't. Glad to know you have nail down
> >> this issue on ext3. I am pretty sure I saw this on Reiser3 once, I will
> >> double check it. Will try your patch today.
> >
> > There's a second leak, with similar-looking symptoms. At ~50
> > commits/second it has leaked ~10MB in 24 hours, so it's very slow - less
> > than a hundredth the rate of the first one.
>
> What are you using to see these with, just kgdb, and a large cranial
> capacity? Or is there some more magic?
>
Nothing magical: run the test for a while, kill everything, cause a huge
swapstorm then look at the meminfo numbers. If active+inactive is
significantly larger than cahed+buffers+swapcached+mapped+minus-a-bit then
it's leaked.
Right now I have:
MemTotal: 246264 kB
MemFree: 196148 kB
Buffers: 4200 kB
Cached: 3308 kB
SwapCached: 8064 kB
Active: 21548 kB
Inactive: 12532 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 246264 kB
LowFree: 196148 kB
SwapTotal: 1020116 kB
SwapFree: 1001612 kB
Dirty: 60 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
Mapped: 2284 kB
Slab: 12200 kB
CommitLimit: 1143248 kB
Committed_AS: 34004 kB
PageTables: 1200 kB
VmallocTotal: 774136 kB
VmallocUsed: 82832 kB
VmallocChunk: 691188 kB
HugePages_Total: 0
HugePages_Free: 0
33 megs on the LRU, unaccounted for in other places.
Once the leak is nice and large I can start a new swapstorm, set a
breakpoint in try_to_free_buffers() (for example) and start looking at the
state of the page and its buffers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-04 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-15 20:44 OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4 Noah Meyerhans
2005-03-15 21:56 ` Sean
2005-03-15 22:12 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-15 23:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 16:12 ` Noah Meyerhans
2005-04-13 13:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-14 16:56 ` Noah Meyerhans
2005-03-16 0:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 11:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 12:04 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 12:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 18:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 19:53 ` OOM problems on 2.6.12-rc1 with many fsx tests Mingming Cao
2005-03-23 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-03-23 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:26 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-23 23:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-03-23 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:49 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-24 1:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-24 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 22:11 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-27 0:23 ` Mingming Cao
2005-03-27 19:22 ` Mingming Cao
2005-03-27 20:06 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-27 20:17 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-26 0:17 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-26 0:20 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-04-04 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-04 16:50 ` Mingming Cao
2005-04-04 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-04 20:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-04-04 20:33 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-04-05 17:04 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2005-04-06 1:23 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-12 12:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-04-05 16:44 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-03-16 12:23 ` OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 12:30 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050404133333.79fd9d93.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=janetinc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome