From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: andrea@suse.de, mjbligh@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, sct@redhat.com,
janetinc@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Ext2-devel] Re: OOM problems on 2.6.12-rc1 with many fsx tests
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 18:23:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050405182325.5297ff87.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112720671.3522.6.camel@dyn9047017080.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I run the test(20 instances of fsx) with your patch on 2.6.12-rc1 with
> 512MB RAM (where I were able to constantly re-create the mem leak and
> lead to OOM before). The result is the kernel did not get into OOM after
> about 19 hours(before it took about 9 hours or so), system is still
> responsive. However I did notice about ~60MB delta between Active
> +Inactive and Buffers+cached+Swapcached+Mapped+Slab
yes.
Nobody has noticed the now-fixed leak since 2.6.6 and this one appears to
be 100x slower. Which is fortunate because this one is going to take a
long time to fix. I'll poke at it some more.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-06 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-15 20:44 OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4 Noah Meyerhans
2005-03-15 21:56 ` Sean
2005-03-15 22:12 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-15 23:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-18 16:12 ` Noah Meyerhans
2005-04-13 13:47 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-04-14 16:56 ` Noah Meyerhans
2005-03-16 0:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 11:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 12:04 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 12:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 18:37 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-16 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 19:53 ` OOM problems on 2.6.12-rc1 with many fsx tests Mingming Cao
2005-03-23 22:49 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:13 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-03-23 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:26 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-23 23:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-03-23 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-23 23:49 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-24 1:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-03-24 2:00 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-25 22:11 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-27 0:23 ` Mingming Cao
2005-03-27 19:22 ` Mingming Cao
2005-03-27 20:06 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-27 20:17 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-03-26 0:17 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-26 0:20 ` [Ext2-devel] " Badari Pulavarty
2005-04-04 1:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-04 16:50 ` Mingming Cao
2005-04-04 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-04 20:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-04-04 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2005-04-05 17:04 ` [Ext2-devel] " Mingming Cao
2005-04-06 1:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2005-04-12 12:50 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-04-05 16:44 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-03-16 12:23 ` OOM problems with 2.6.11-rc4 Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 12:30 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050405182325.5297ff87.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=janetinc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjbligh@us.ibm.com \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®