Re: [PATCH 1/22] UML - Include the linker script rather than symlink it

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Al Viro <viro@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 05:44:05PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > There's a bit of a tangle going on in arch/um/kernel/Makefile, but it's
> > fairly simple stuff.
> > 
> > I put a rolled-up patch against 2.6.12-rc3 at
> > http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/x.bz2 if someone wants to
> > check it all.
> 
> Broken, due to missing mk_sc patch (it should go before mk_thread one;

OK.  I ended up with an odd-looking arch/um/sys-x86_64/util/Makefile:



# Copyright 2003 - 2004 Pathscale, Inc
# Released under the GPL

hostprogs-y	:= mk_sc mk_thread
always		:= $(hostprogs-y)

HOSTCFLAGS_mk_thread.o := -I$(objtree)/arch/um


Is mk_sc still supposed to be in there?

> how the hell did the latter manage to apply at all?)

I just "fixed" things.  I do it all the time.

> > Is this all considered post-2.6.12 material?
> 
> Once all patches are in there - up to Jeff ;-)  Seriously, kbuild patchkit
> is decently tested and has obviously no impact on other architectures.  So
> that one is up to maintainer of architecture in question...

OK..