* [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ()
@ 2005-08-06 16:14 Karsten Wiese
2005-08-06 21:28 ` Ingo Oeser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karsten Wiese @ 2005-08-06 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel
Hi Ingo,
from the bitkeeper logs I found you made the last
global-arch-relevant changes in this area.
Please comment or pass it on as appropriate.
Patch is for mainline 2.6.13-rc5.
Thanks,
Karsten
From: Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
IRQ_PER_CPU is not used by all architectures.
To avoid dead code generation in __do_IRQ()
this patch introduces the macro ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU.
ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU is defined by architectures using
IRQ_PER_CPU in their
include/asm_ARCH/irq.h
file.
Through grepping the tree I found the following
architectures currently use IRQ_PER_CPU:
cris, ia64, ppc, ppc64 and parisc.
Signed-off-by: Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-cris/irq.h linux-2.6.13/include/asm-cris/irq.h
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-cris/irq.h 2005-08-06 16:44:41.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-cris/irq.h 2005-08-06 18:06:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,6 +1,11 @@
#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_H
#define _ASM_IRQ_H
+/*
+ * IRQ line status macro IRQ_PER_CPU is used
+ */
+#define ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+
#include <asm/arch/irq.h>
extern __inline__ int irq_canonicalize(int irq)
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-ia64/irq.h linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ia64/irq.h
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-ia64/irq.h 2005-08-06 16:47:24.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ia64/irq.h 2005-08-06 18:06:53.000000000 +0200
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
#define NR_IRQS 256
#define NR_IRQ_VECTORS NR_IRQS
+/*
+ * IRQ line status macro IRQ_PER_CPU is used
+ */
+#define ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+
static __inline__ int
irq_canonicalize (int irq)
{
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-parisc/irq.h linux-2.6.13/include/asm-parisc/irq.h
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-parisc/irq.h 2005-08-06 16:50:29.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-parisc/irq.h 2005-08-06 18:05:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -26,6 +26,11 @@
#define NR_IRQS (CPU_IRQ_MAX + 1)
+/*
+ * IRQ line status macro IRQ_PER_CPU is used
+ */
+#define ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+
static __inline__ int irq_canonicalize(int irq)
{
return (irq == 2) ? 9 : irq;
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-ppc/irq.h linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc/irq.h
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-ppc/irq.h 2005-08-02 13:55:51.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc/irq.h 2005-08-06 18:10:19.000000000 +0200
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
#define IRQ_POLARITY_POSITIVE 0x2 /* high level or low->high edge */
#define IRQ_POLARITY_NEGATIVE 0x0 /* low level or high->low edge */
+/*
+ * IRQ line status macro IRQ_PER_CPU is used
+ */
+#define ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+
#if defined(CONFIG_40x)
#include <asm/ibm4xx.h>
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-ppc64/irq.h linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc64/irq.h
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/include/asm-ppc64/irq.h 2005-08-06 16:41:14.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/asm-ppc64/irq.h 2005-08-06 18:06:58.000000000 +0200
@@ -33,6 +33,11 @@
#define IRQ_POLARITY_POSITIVE 0x2 /* high level or low->high edge */
#define IRQ_POLARITY_NEGATIVE 0x0 /* low level or high->low edge */
+/*
+ * IRQ line status macro IRQ_PER_CPU is used
+ */
+#define ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU
+
#define get_irq_desc(irq) (&irq_desc[(irq)])
/* Define a way to iterate across irqs. */
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/include/linux/irq.h linux-2.6.13/include/linux/irq.h
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/include/linux/irq.h 2005-08-06 16:36:14.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/include/linux/irq.h 2005-08-06 16:36:30.000000000 +0200
@@ -32,7 +32,9 @@
#define IRQ_WAITING 32 /* IRQ not yet seen - for autodetection */
#define IRQ_LEVEL 64 /* IRQ level triggered */
#define IRQ_MASKED 128 /* IRQ masked - shouldn't be seen again */
+#if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU)
#define IRQ_PER_CPU 256 /* IRQ is per CPU */
+#endif
/*
* Interrupt controller descriptor. This is all we need
diff -upr linux-2.6.13_orig/kernel/irq/handle.c linux-2.6.13/kernel/irq/handle.c
--- linux-2.6.13_orig/kernel/irq/handle.c 2005-08-06 15:53:37.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.13/kernel/irq/handle.c 2005-08-06 15:19:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned
kstat_this_cpu.irqs[irq]++;
+#if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU)
if (desc->status & IRQ_PER_CPU) {
irqreturn_t action_ret;
@@ -123,6 +124,7 @@ fastcall unsigned int __do_IRQ(unsigned
desc->handler->end(irq);
return 1;
}
+#endif
spin_lock(&desc->lock);
desc->handler->ack(irq);
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ()
2005-08-06 16:14 [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ() Karsten Wiese
@ 2005-08-06 21:28 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-08-07 10:25 ` Karsten Wiese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Oeser @ 2005-08-06 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karsten Wiese; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 750 bytes --]
Hi Karsten,
On Saturday 06 August 2005 18:14, Karsten Wiese wrote:
> From: Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
>
> IRQ_PER_CPU is not used by all architectures.
> To avoid dead code generation in __do_IRQ()
> this patch introduces the macro ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU.
>
> ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU is defined by architectures using
> IRQ_PER_CPU in their
> include/asm_ARCH/irq.h
> file.
Why not the other way around?
Just define IRQ_PER_CPU to 0 on architectures not needing it and
add a FAT comment there, that this disables it. Or make it a config option.
Then just leave the code as is and let GCC optimize the dead code
away without any changes in the C file. It works, I just checked it ;-)
Regards
Ingo Oeser
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ()
2005-08-06 21:28 ` Ingo Oeser
@ 2005-08-07 10:25 ` Karsten Wiese
2005-08-07 11:07 ` Ingo Oeser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karsten Wiese @ 2005-08-07 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Oeser; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
Am Samstag, 6. August 2005 23:28 schrieb Ingo Oeser:
> Hi Karsten,
>
> On Saturday 06 August 2005 18:14, Karsten Wiese wrote:
> > From: Karsten Wiese <annabellesgarden@yahoo.de>
> >
> > IRQ_PER_CPU is not used by all architectures.
> > To avoid dead code generation in __do_IRQ()
> > this patch introduces the macro ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU.
> >
> > ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU is defined by architectures using
> > IRQ_PER_CPU in their
> > include/asm_ARCH/irq.h
> > file.
>
> Why not the other way around?
>
> Just define IRQ_PER_CPU to 0 on architectures not needing it and
> add a FAT comment there, that this disables it. Or make it a config option.
>
> Then just leave the code as is and let GCC optimize the dead code
> away without any changes in the C file. It works, I just checked it ;-)
>
With my proposal the
#if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU)
....
#endif
lets readers of __do_IRQ() immediately grasp:
"this block might not be compiled / depends an ARCH"
And you'll get compile error's using IRQ_PER_CPU on ie i386,
letting you immediately know,
that you've got to change something to be able to use IRQ_PER_CPU.
That are advantages I think.
Otherwise your proposal is ok for me too.
Regards,
Karsten
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ()
2005-08-07 10:25 ` Karsten Wiese
@ 2005-08-07 11:07 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-08-07 11:56 ` Karsten Wiese
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Oeser @ 2005-08-07 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Karsten Wiese; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1476 bytes --]
Hi Karsten,
On Sunday 07 August 2005 12:25, Karsten Wiese wrote:
> With my proposal the
> #if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU)
> ....
> #endif
> lets readers of __do_IRQ() immediately grasp:
> "this block might not be compiled / depends an ARCH"
> And you'll get compile error's using IRQ_PER_CPU on ie i386,
> letting you immediately know,
> that you've got to change something to be able to use IRQ_PER_CPU.
>
> That are advantages I think.
That's a valid argument. But an if is an if for the reader.
It is a conditional he has to be aware of and it usally has
no idention, if it is just inside "#if" instead of "if ()".
I have seen people seen missing "#if 0" [1] around code while
reading it. Missing an normal if () is harder with proper idention.
A normal conditional has also the advantage, that the compiler
checks the code for syntactic and some semantic errors within it.
In an "#if 0" you can basically write any plain text[2] and any error
will go undetected, until it becomes an "#if 1".
Since your define is true for most compilations out there,
this argument is not very strong.
Last argument: Many kernel developers -- including Linus --
don't like "#if" in C files and prefer them in headers.
Their reasons might be similiar to my own.
Regards
Ingo Oeser
[1] Let's just consider the values of the pre-processor symbols here, ok?
[2] Pavel Machek used this already to combine Makefile and C file :-)
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ()
2005-08-07 11:07 ` Ingo Oeser
@ 2005-08-07 11:56 ` Karsten Wiese
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Karsten Wiese @ 2005-08-07 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Oeser; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel
Am Sonntag, 7. August 2005 13:07 schrieb Ingo Oeser:
> Last argument: Many kernel developers -- including Linus --
> don't like "#if" in C files and prefer them in headers.
> Their reasons might be similiar to my own.
What about writing
if(CHECK_IRQ_PER_CPU(desc->status)) {
...
}
in __do_IRQ(),
and
#if defined(ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU)
#define IRQ_PER_CPU 256 /* IRQ is per CPU */
#define CHECK_IRQ_PER_CPU(var) ((var) & IRQ_PER_CPU)
#else
#define CHECK_IRQ_PER_CPU(var) 0
#endif
in "include/linux/irq.h" then?
Gruesse,
Karsten
___________________________________________________________
Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-07 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-06 16:14 [PATCH] ARCH_HAS_IRQ_PER_CPU avoids dead code in __do_IRQ() Karsten Wiese
2005-08-06 21:28 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-08-07 10:25 ` Karsten Wiese
2005-08-07 11:07 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-08-07 11:56 ` Karsten Wiese
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®