From: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org,
ck list <ck@vds.kolivas.org>,
rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:00:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050907150035.GB4590@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050907081303.GC5804@atomide.com>
On 07.09.2005 [11:13:04 +0300], Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@us.ibm.com> [050906 23:55]:
>
> ...
>
> > Sigh, later than I had hoped, but here is what I have hashed out so far.
> > Does it seem like a step in the right direction? Rather hand-wavy, but I
> > think it's mostly correct ;)
>
> Some comments below.
Thanks, Tony!
> > - include/linux/intsource.h
> > with definitions in kernel/intsource.c
> >
> > #define DYN_TICK_ENABLED (1 << 1)
> > #define DYN_TICK_SUITABLE (1 << 0)
> >
> > #define DYN_TICK_MIN_SKIP 2
> >
> > /* Abstraction of an interrupt source
> > * @state: current state
> > * @max_skip: current maximum number of ticks to skip
> > * @arch_init: initialization routine
> > * @arch_enable_dyn_tick: called via sysfs to enable interrupt skipping
> > * @arch_disable_dyn_tick: called via sysfs to disable interrupt
> > * skipping
> > * @arch_set_all_cpus_idle: last cpu to go idle calls this, which should
> > * disable any timesource (e.g. PIT on x86)
> > * @arch_recover_time: handler for returning from skipped ticks and keeping
> > * time consistent
> > */
> > struct interrupt_source {
> > unsigned int state;
> > unsigned long max_skip;
> > int (*arch_init) (void);
> > void (*arch_enable_dyn_tick) (void);
> > void (*arch_disable_dyn_tick) (void);
> > unsigned long (*arch_reprogram) (unsigned long); /* return number of ticks skipped */
> > unsigned long (*arch_recover_time) (int, void *, struct pt_regs *); /* handler in arm */
> > /* following empty in UP */
> > void (*arch_set_all_cpus_idle) (int);
> > spinlock_t lock;
> > };
>
> I would still call the struct dyntick, have CONFIG_DYNTICK, and then have
> CONFIG_NO_IDLE_HZ and possibly CONFIG_SUBJIFFIE_TIMER register to use it
> like I said in my earlier mail. Would that solve the issues you have
> with the naming?
I'll respond more fully there, but I think it might. If that's the case,
though, I think I'll just push all of the code down into timer.c and
timer.h, no need for a separate file, really. I'll mull it over, see
what the others think as well...
> > /* return number of ticks skipped, potentially for accounting purposes? */
> > extern unsigned long reprogram_interrupt(void);
>
> The number of ticks skipped can be potentially used in idle loops to
> select which ACPI C state to go to depending on the estimated length of
> sleep.
Ah true!
Thanks,
Nish
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-07 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-31 16:58 Updated dynamic tick patches Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-31 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick calculation in timer_pm.c Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-31 22:36 ` Zachary Amsden
2005-08-31 22:47 ` john stultz
2005-09-02 15:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86 Con Kolivas
2005-09-02 15:45 ` [PATCH 2/3] dyntick - Fix lost tick calculation in timer pm.c Con Kolivas
2005-09-02 15:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] dyntick - Recover walltime upon wakeup Con Kolivas
2005-09-02 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] dyntick - Fix lost tick calculation in timer pm.c Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-02 20:18 ` Thomas Schlichter
2005-09-02 21:21 ` john stultz
2005-09-02 16:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86 Russell King
2005-09-02 17:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-03 6:13 ` Con Kolivas
2005-09-03 7:58 ` Russell King
2005-09-03 8:01 ` Con Kolivas
2005-09-03 8:06 ` Russell King
2005-09-03 8:14 ` Con Kolivas
2005-09-04 20:10 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-04 20:26 ` Russell King
2005-09-04 20:37 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-04 21:17 ` Russell King
2005-09-05 3:08 ` Con Kolivas
2005-09-05 16:28 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 6:58 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-05 16:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-04 20:41 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 5:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 5:48 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 6:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 6:44 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-06 20:51 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-07 8:13 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-07 15:00 ` Nishanth Aravamudan [this message]
2005-09-07 15:53 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-07 17:07 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-07 17:23 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-07 18:14 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-07 18:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-07 16:14 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-09-07 16:42 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-09-07 17:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-07 17:27 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-09-07 18:18 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-07 18:33 ` Nish Aravamudan
2005-09-09 16:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-09-05 7:37 ` Russell King
2005-09-05 7:49 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 8:00 ` Russell King
2005-09-05 16:33 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 7:00 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 7:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-05 17:02 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-07 7:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-07 15:05 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-08 10:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-08 21:22 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-08 22:08 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-09 22:30 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-20 11:06 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-20 14:58 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-22 13:38 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-09-22 14:52 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-22 18:32 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-26 15:08 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-23 6:55 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 7:44 ` Russell King
2005-09-05 8:19 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 8:32 ` Russell King
2005-09-05 9:24 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 17:06 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 17:04 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 17:27 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 18:06 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 13:19 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 16:57 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-05 17:25 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-05 18:11 ` Nishanth Aravamudan
2005-09-03 4:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Fix lost tick calculation in timer_pm.c Lee Revell
2005-09-03 4:18 ` Peter Williams
2005-09-03 4:34 ` Lee Revell
2005-09-03 4:48 ` Peter Williams
2005-09-03 5:15 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-09-03 5:30 ` Lee Revell
2005-09-03 5:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-06 10:32 ` Pavel Machek
2005-09-06 10:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-06 18:04 ` john stultz
2005-08-31 17:26 ` [PATCH 2/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Cleanup Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-08-31 17:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] Updated dynamic tick patches - Recover walltime upon wakeup Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-01 5:23 ` Updated dynamic tick patches Con Kolivas
2005-09-01 13:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-01 13:19 ` David Weinehall
2005-09-01 13:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-09-01 14:11 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-02 17:34 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2005-09-03 10:16 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050907150035.GB4590@us.ibm.com \
--to=nacc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome