From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: hugh@veritas.com
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] unpaged: private write VM_RESERVED
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 15:36:52 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051117.153652.07424965.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0511171929210.4563@goblin.wat.veritas.com>
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 19:30:04 +0000 (GMT)
> The PageReserved removal in 2.6.15-rc1 issued a "deprecated" message
> when you tried to mmap or mprotect MAP_PRIVATE PROT_WRITE a VM_RESERVED,
> and failed with -EACCES: because do_wp_page lacks the refinement to COW
> pages in those areas, nor do we expect to find anonymous pages in them;
> and it seemed just bloat to add code for handling such a peculiar case.
> But immediately it caused vbetool and ddcprobe (using lrmi) to fail.
>
> So revert the "deprecated" messages, letting mmap and mprotect succeed.
> But leave do_wp_page's BUG_ON(vma->vm_flags & VM_RESERVED) in place
> until we've added the code to do it right: so this particular patch is
> only good if the app doesn't really need to write to that private area.
>
> Dave Jones has changed vbetool & ddcprobe to use MAP_SHARED or PROT_READ
> just as well, but we don't want to force people to update their tools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
lrmi makes two mmaps of interest on "/dev/mem":
1) the lowest page, which includes the interrupt vectors and
the BIOS data area
the BIOS code it executes does need to write to that BIOS
data area, so PROT_WRITE is necessary, but more on this...
2) the ROM image from 0xa0000 -> 0x100000, no PROT_WRITE necessary
But the thing about #1, which needs the PROT_WRITE, is that it does
not want anonymous pages for that stuff, it's mapping the real
physical memory at those addresses, and indeed /dev/mem is going to
setup all the damn page tables already regardless of whether
MAP_SHARED or MAP_PRIVATE is set, and logically indeed MAP_SHARED is
the thing which should be specified here because this mapping is
not "private" to the application in any sense.
That is, /dev/mem mmap()'s do the remap_pfn_range() for the whole area
being mmap()'d (which is where the VM_RESERVED comes from), and
therefore no COW page faults should ever occur for such areas. Faults
can occur for protection violations or memory errors, but that's it.
I would even argue that MAP_PRIVATE on things like /dev/mem should be
flagged with at least a kernel log message if not an outright -EINVAL
as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-17 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-17 19:28 [PATCH 00/11] unpaged: PageReserved VM fixups Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 19:29 ` [PATCH 01/11] unpaged: get_user_pages VM_RESERVED Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 23:29 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-17 19:30 ` [PATCH 02/11] unpaged: private write VM_RESERVED Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 19:41 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 20:46 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-11-17 20:51 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-17 23:58 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 7:12 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-11-18 7:59 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-17 20:59 ` Dominik Brodowski
2005-11-17 23:36 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2005-11-17 19:31 ` [PATCH 03/11] unpaged: sound nopage get_page Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 23:41 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-17 19:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] unpaged: unifdefed PageCompound Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 23:43 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-19 20:15 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-19 20:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-19 21:41 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-19 21:58 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-17 19:34 ` [PATCH 05/11] unpaged: VM_UNPAGED Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 20:59 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-11-17 23:46 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-17 19:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] unpaged: VM_NONLINEAR VM_RESERVED Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 19:37 ` [PATCH 07/11] unpaged: COW on VM_UNPAGED Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 23:52 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 5:46 ` Nick Piggin
2005-11-18 6:45 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 7:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-18 7:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-11-18 8:04 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 8:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-18 8:02 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-18 8:08 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 8:13 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-18 8:36 ` David S. Miller
2005-11-18 9:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-18 21:08 ` Dave Jones
2005-11-18 19:12 ` Alan Cox
2005-11-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 08/11] unpaged: anon in VM_UNPAGED Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 19:38 ` [PATCH 09/11] unpaged: ZERO_PAGE " Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 21:25 ` Ingo Oeser
2005-11-18 19:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 19:39 ` [PATCH 10/11] unpaged: PG_reserved bad_page Hugh Dickins
2005-11-17 19:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] unpaged: copy_page_range vma Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051117.153652.07424965.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome