Re: [PATCH -rt] Remove double history

Re: [PATCH -rt] Remove double history

[Ingo Molnar]

* Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:

> 	Assuming you don't want it in there twice .

indeed - applied.

	Ingo

[PATCH -rt] Remove double history

[Daniel Walker]

	Assuming you don't want it in there twice .

Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>

Index: linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.16.orig/kernel/rt.c
+++ linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c
@@ -19,17 +19,6 @@
  * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes,
  * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too.
  *
- * historic credit for proving that Linux spinlocks can be implemented via
- * RT-aware mutexes goes to many people: The Pmutex project (Dirk Grambow
- * and others) who prototyped it on 2.4 and did lots of comparative
- * research and analysis; TimeSys, for proving that you can implement a
- * fully preemptible kernel via the use of IRQ threading and mutexes;
- * Bill Huey for persuasively arguing on lkml that the mutex model is the
- * right one; and to MontaVista, who ported pmutexes to 2.6.
- *
- * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes,
- * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too.
- *
  * lock debugging, locking tree, deadlock detection:
  *
  *  Copyright (C) 2004, LynuxWorks, Inc., Igor Manyilov, Bill Huey