From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:54:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060616125403.GA16194@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1150430429.10290.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Quoting Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au):
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 22:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Rusty Russell (rusty@rustcorp.com.au):
> > > Seems like change for change's sake, to me, *and* it added more code
> > > than it removed.
> >
> > So if kernel_thread is really going to be removed, how else should this
> > be done? Just clone?
>
> Sorry, is kernel_thread going to be removed, or just not exported to
> modules? What's kthread going to use?
>
> Confused,
> Rusty.
Hah.
Yes, I see. I misread. So I should be focusing on modules :)
Really, all *I* care about is cases where the resulting pid is cached
as a pointer to the thread, which it wasn't here anyway.
thanks, sorry for the noise.
-serge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-16 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <17553.56625.612931.136018@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2006-06-16 1:04 ` Rusty Russell
2006-06-16 3:04 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-16 3:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-16 4:00 ` Rusty Russell
2006-06-16 12:54 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2006-06-18 12:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2006-06-15 14:43 Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-20 3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 3:20 ` Erik Ohrnberger
2006-06-20 8:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-20 8:40 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 16:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-20 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 0:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-21 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21 1:44 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060616125403.GA16194@sergelap.austin.ibm.com \
--to=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®