mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 19:52:06 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621005206.GA24600@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060620154241.024ad134.akpm@osdl.org>

Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org):
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org):
> > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 03:27:45 -0500
> > > "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Ah, like so?
> > > 
> > > Nope.  kthread_bind() is supposed to be called by the thread creator,
> > > before the thread is started.
> > > 
> > > The documentation for kthread_bind() is irritatingly hidden in the header
> > > file.
> > 
> > Oh, I see - then it makes more sense that it gets away with being so
> > much simpler than set_cpus_allowed().
> > 
> > So here's another attempt.  However I'm not sure now whether
> > the first round of synchronization around stopmachine_thread_ack
> > is necessary anymore.  If any threads fail, we'll find out from the
> > kthread_create() return value, right?
> > 
> > Still I'm not sure about that, so first things first:
> > 
> > thanks,
> > -serge
> > 
> > From: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> > Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:01:08 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] kthread: update stop_machine to use kthread_bind
> > 
> > Update stop_machine to use the more efficient kthread_bind()
> > before running task in place of set_cpus_allowed() after.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> >  kernel/stop_machine.c |    7 +++++--
> >  1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > e25a88e3d60f3f139f10cc8cd894d87622033a16
> > diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> > index 2dd5a48..593d8e4 100644
> > --- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
> > +++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
> > @@ -86,7 +86,8 @@ static void stopmachine_set_state(enum s
> >  
> >  static int stop_machine(void)
> >  {
> > -	int i, ret = 0;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +	unsigned int i;
> >  	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 };
> >  
> >  	/* One high-prio thread per cpu.  We'll do this one. */
> > @@ -100,11 +101,13 @@ static int stop_machine(void)
> >  		struct task_struct *tsk;
> >  		if (i == raw_smp_processor_id())
> >  			continue;
> > -		tsk = kthread_run(stopmachine, (void *)(long)i, "stopmachine");
> > +		tsk = kthread_create(stopmachine, NULL, "stopmachine");
> >  		if (IS_ERR(tsk)) {
> >  			ret = PTR_ERR(tsk);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > +		kthread_bind(tsk, i);
> > +		wake_up_process(tsk);
> >  		stopmachine_num_threads++;
> >  	}
> >  
> 
> You forgot this rather important bit:

Confounded, the only thing I can figure is I must not have done a
git-format-patch to regenerate the patch before I pasted it.

I see it's all sorted out in -mm, but just for the record here's
the patch I meant to send.

thanks,
-serge

>From nobody Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge E. Hallyn <hallyn@sergelap.(none)>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 11:01:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] kthread: update stop_machine to use kthread_bind

Update stop_machine to use the more efficient kthread_bind()
before running task in place of set_cpus_allowed() after.

Signed-off-by: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>

---

 kernel/stop_machine.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

fe140b494141aefae45a4fa12a4b4e8fef5d8ee3
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 2dd5a48..698b842 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -26,15 +26,13 @@ static unsigned int stopmachine_num_thre
 static atomic_t stopmachine_thread_ack;
 static DECLARE_MUTEX(stopmachine_mutex);
 
-static int stopmachine(void *cpu)
+static int stopmachine(void)
 {
 	int irqs_disabled = 0;
 	int prepared = 0;
 
-	set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu((int)(long)cpu));
-
 	/* Ack: we are alive */
-	smp_mb(); /* Theoretically the ack = 0 might not be on this CPU yet. */
+	smp_mb();
 	atomic_inc(&stopmachine_thread_ack);
 
 	/* Simple state machine */
@@ -86,7 +84,8 @@ static void stopmachine_set_state(enum s
 
 static int stop_machine(void)
 {
-	int i, ret = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned int i;
 	struct sched_param param = { .sched_priority = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 };
 
 	/* One high-prio thread per cpu.  We'll do this one. */
@@ -100,11 +99,13 @@ static int stop_machine(void)
 		struct task_struct *tsk;
 		if (i == raw_smp_processor_id())
 			continue;
-		tsk = kthread_run(stopmachine, (void *)(long)i, "stopmachine");
+		tsk = kthread_create(stopmachine, NULL, "stopmachine");
 		if (IS_ERR(tsk)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(tsk);
 			break;
 		}
+		kthread_bind(tsk, i);
+		wake_up_process(tsk);
 		stopmachine_num_threads++;
 	}
 
-- 
1.3.3


  reply	other threads:[~2006-06-21  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-06-15 14:43 Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-20  3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20  3:20   ` Erik Ohrnberger
2006-06-20  8:27   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-20  8:40     ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 16:27       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-20 22:42         ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21  0:52           ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2006-06-21  1:18             ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-21  1:44               ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-21  3:15       ` [PATCH] kthread: move kernel-doc and put it into DocBook Randy.Dunlap
     [not found] <17553.56625.612931.136018@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2006-06-16  1:04 ` [PATCH] kthread: convert stop_machine into a kthread Rusty Russell
2006-06-16  3:04   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-16  3:54     ` Paul Mackerras
2006-06-16  4:00     ` Rusty Russell
2006-06-16 12:54       ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-06-18 12:12         ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060621005206.GA24600@sergelap.austin.ibm.com \
    --to=serue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®