From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dave Olson <olson@unixfolk.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, ccb@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch] increase spinlock-debug looping timeouts (write_lock and NMI)
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:39:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060619233947.94f7e644.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0606192231380.25413@osa.unixfolk.com>
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 22:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Dave Olson <olson@unixfolk.com> wrote:
> |
> | I get that impression ;) If it takes 1-2 seconds to get this lock then it
> | can take five seconds. a) that's just gross and b) the NMI watchdog will
> | nuke the box.
> |
> | Why is it taking so long to get the lock?
> |
> | Does it happen in non-debug mode?
> |
> | What do we do about it?
>
> It seems possible that this might be the cause of problems we've had
> with our InfiniPath hardware/software, and also Mellanox/OpenIB hardware/software
> on some quad-socket/dual core opteron systems (8 cpu cores).
>
> We'll see very long delays when 8 MPI processes exit "simultaneously", and sometimes
> get NMI, sometimes system hangs, and sometimes just hung up for many seconds (and
> often in that state, doing sysrq-P or sysrq-T will make things happy again).
>
OK. I assume these processes have done a mmap(MAP_SHARED) of a lot of
memory?
> A typical trace looks like this (on an fc4 2.6.16 kernel):
fc4? You seem to have an RH-FCx which doesn't enable
CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK. Or maybe we didn't have all that debug code in
2.6.16. Doesn't matter, really.
> [root@quad-00 ~]# NMI Watchdog detected LOCKUP on CPU 0
> CPU 0
> Modules linked in: nfs nfsd exportfs lockd nfs_acl ipv6 autofs4 sunrpc ib_sdp(U)
> ib_cm(U) ib_umad(U) ib_uverbs(U) ib_ipoib(U) ib_sa(U) ib_ipath(U) ib_mad(U)
> ib_core(U) video button battery ac i2c_nforce2 i2c_core ipath_core(U) e1000
> floppy sg dm_snapshot dm_zero dm_mirror ext3 jbd dm_mod sata_nv libata aic79xx
> scsi_transport_spi sd_mod scsi_mod
> Pid: 4239, comm: mpi_multibw Not tainted 2.6.16-1.2096_FC4.rootsmp #1
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff80213a30>] <ffffffff80213a30>{_raw_write_lock+161}
> RSP: 0018:ffff810078e07c18 EFLAGS: 00000086
> RAX: 000000008f100300 RBX: ffff81007b7bea58 RCX: 00000000002dc5a0
> RDX: 0000000000927efd RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff81007b7bea58
> RBP: ffff81007b7bea40 R08: ffff810002e3ae80 R09: 00000000fffffffa
> R10: 0000000000000003 R11: ffffffff801644e2 R12: ffff81007b7bea58
> R13: 00002aaaad800000 R14: ffff810002e3aec0 R15: 00002aaabba6f000
> FS: 0000000040a00960(0000) GS:ffffffff80514000(0000) knlGS:00000000f7fc86c0
> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 00000033f38bdaf0 CR3: 0000000000101000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> Process mpi_multibw (pid: 4239, threadinfo ffff810078e06000, task ffff810079d8a040)
> Stack: ffff810002e3aec0 ffffffff8016452b 0000000078ebb067 00002aaaad757000
> ffff810078dccab8 ffffffff8016b840 0000000000000000 ffff810078e07d38
> ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000
> Call Trace: <ffffffff8016452b>{__set_page_dirty_nobuffers+73}
> <ffffffff8016b840>{unmap_vmas+1042} <ffffffff8016e638>{exit_mmap+124}
> <ffffffff80132b07>{mmput+37} <ffffffff80138373>{do_exit+584}
> <ffffffff801416dc>{__dequeue_signal+459} <ffffffff80138af0>{sys_exit_group+0}
> <ffffffff80142af3>{get_signal_to_deliver+1568}
> <ffffffff8010a14a>{do_signal+116}
> <ffffffff80195dc1>{__pollwait+0} <ffffffff80196b0c>{sys_select+934}
> <ffffffff8010aa87>{sysret_signal+28}
> <ffffffff8010ad73>{ptregscall_common+103}
>
> Code: 84 c0 75 7f f0 81 03 00 00 00 01 f3 90 48 83 c1 01 48 8b 15
> Kernel panic - not syncing: nmi watchdog
blam, dead box, that's the one, thanks.
With our current rwlock semantics I don't know if this is fixable.
Probably we need to go back to a spinlock on tree_lock.
With a -stable backport. I suspect this is triggerable on demand.
<tries it, fails>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-20 6:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.VT2rwoX1M/2O/aO5crhlRDNx4YA@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Zp589GPrIISmAAheRowfRgZ1jgs@ifi.uio.no>
2006-06-20 5:35 ` Dave Olson
2006-06-20 6:39 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-06-20 6:53 ` Dave Jones
2006-06-20 7:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 8:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-20 9:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-20 10:59 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 13:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 13:28 ` update pci device id cckuo
2006-06-20 14:06 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 13:36 ` [patch] increase spinlock-debug looping timeouts (write_lock and NMI) Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 14:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 15:16 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 16:27 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 8:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 16:11 ` Dave Olson
2006-06-20 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-22 5:45 Dave Olson
2006-06-22 5:57 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-23 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-23 16:27 Dave Olson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060619233947.94f7e644.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ccb@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=olson@unixfolk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®