From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Dave Olson <olson@unixfolk.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, ccb@acm.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [patch] increase spinlock-debug looping timeouts (write_lock and NMI)
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:57:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060621225752.93cfffb0.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0606212243240.32136@osa.unixfolk.com>
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:45:49 -0700 (PDT)
Dave Olson <olson@unixfolk.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Andrew Morton wrote:
> | > Intended to be more or less stock fc4 but with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y and
> | > 2.6.17-based patch so the 8131 MSI quirk isn't enabled.
> | >
> | > >From the config file:
> | > CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y
> | > CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP=y
> |
> | OK, I goofed again.
> |
> | It would be super-interesting to know whether CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=n
> | improves things.
>
> It does. No stalls, hangs, or nmi's in several hours of running the
> test that previously failed on almost every run (with long stalls, system
> hangs, or NMI watchdogs), on the same hardware.
>
> I made no other changes to the kernel config than turning both of
> the above off.
>
Well isn't that interesting, thanks. We have our 2.6.17.x patch.
Now we need to work out why.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-22 5:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-22 5:45 Dave Olson
2006-06-22 5:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-06-23 7:57 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-23 16:27 Dave Olson
[not found] <fa.VT2rwoX1M/2O/aO5crhlRDNx4YA@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.Zp589GPrIISmAAheRowfRgZ1jgs@ifi.uio.no>
2006-06-20 5:35 ` Dave Olson
2006-06-20 6:39 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 6:53 ` Dave Jones
2006-06-20 7:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 8:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-06-20 8:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-20 9:37 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 9:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-06-20 10:59 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 13:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 13:36 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 14:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 15:16 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 16:27 ` Nick Piggin
2006-06-20 8:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-20 16:11 ` Dave Olson
2006-06-20 21:10 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060621225752.93cfffb0.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ccb@acm.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=olson@unixfolk.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome