mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: RFC: cleaning up the in-kernel headers
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:05:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060711190544.GB1240@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711160639.GY13938@stusta.de>

On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:06:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> My plan is to create a git tree where I'll work on this that will be 
> included in -mm.
> 
> Is this OK for everyone?

Sure, provided it's also tested on non-x86 architectures as well.

At the moment, someone did a "clean up" of linux/tty.h includes
which has broken the 99% of the ARM defconfigs, and despite this
patch being in -mm and allegedly fixed by akpm for ARM, the result
is still massive breakage.

Hence, -mm is probably far too different from mainline for include
cleanups to be properly tested before they're sent to Linus - iow
they need an additional level of testing against Linus' tree _prior_
to being submitted to Linus.

Apart from that, I've no problem with anyone who wants to clean up
the include mess.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:  2.6 Serial core

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-07-11 19:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-07-11 16:06 Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 16:28 ` David Woodhouse
2006-07-11 17:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-11 19:34     ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-11 19:41       ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-11 20:41         ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-07-11 21:37           ` Jörn Engel
2006-07-11 22:01             ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-11 22:20               ` Jörn Engel
2006-07-11 22:39               ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 22:40             ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 21:04     ` David Woodhouse
2006-07-11 22:24   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 17:07 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-11 17:15   ` Joshua Hudson
2006-07-11 18:19     ` Dave Jones
2006-07-11 22:27   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 19:05 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-07-11 22:19   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 20:26 ` [PATCH] Fix broken kernel headers preventing ARM build Russell King
2006-07-13 19:05 ` RFC: cleaning up the in-kernel headers Christoph Lameter
2006-07-15  4:18   ` Steven Rostedt
2006-07-15  4:59     ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-17  0:53       ` Steven Rostedt
2006-07-20 10:56         ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-14  0:11 ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060711190544.GB1240@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome