From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: RFC: cleaning up the in-kernel headers
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:05:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060711190544.GB1240@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060711160639.GY13938@stusta.de>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 06:06:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> My plan is to create a git tree where I'll work on this that will be
> included in -mm.
>
> Is this OK for everyone?
Sure, provided it's also tested on non-x86 architectures as well.
At the moment, someone did a "clean up" of linux/tty.h includes
which has broken the 99% of the ARM defconfigs, and despite this
patch being in -mm and allegedly fixed by akpm for ARM, the result
is still massive breakage.
Hence, -mm is probably far too different from mainline for include
cleanups to be properly tested before they're sent to Linus - iow
they need an additional level of testing against Linus' tree _prior_
to being submitted to Linus.
Apart from that, I've no problem with anyone who wants to clean up
the include mess.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-11 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-11 16:06 Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 16:28 ` David Woodhouse
2006-07-11 17:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-07-11 19:34 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-11 19:41 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-07-11 20:41 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-07-11 21:37 ` Jörn Engel
2006-07-11 22:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-07-11 22:20 ` Jörn Engel
2006-07-11 22:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-07-11 22:40 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 21:04 ` David Woodhouse
2006-07-11 22:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 17:07 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-11 17:15 ` Joshua Hudson
2006-07-11 18:19 ` Dave Jones
2006-07-11 22:27 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 19:05 ` Russell King [this message]
2006-07-11 22:19 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-11 20:26 ` [PATCH] Fix broken kernel headers preventing ARM build Russell King
2006-07-13 19:05 ` RFC: cleaning up the in-kernel headers Christoph Lameter
2006-07-15 4:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-07-15 4:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-07-17 0:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-07-20 10:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-14 0:11 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060711190544.GB1240@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome