From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: jesper.juhl@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kkeil@suse.de,
kai.germaschewski@gmx.de, isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ISDN: fix double free bug in isdn_net
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 02:00:04 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060815.020004.76775981.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200608122248.22639.jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
From: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 22:48:22 +0200
> There's double-free bug in
> drivers/isdn/i4l/isdn_net.c::isdn_net_writebuf_skb().
>
> If isdn_writebuf_skb_stub() doesn't handle the entire skb, then it will
> have freed the skb that was passed to it and when the code then jumps
> to the error label it'll result in a double free of the skb.
>
> The easy way to fix this is to insert an assignment of skb = NULL in the
> 'if' following the call to isdn_writebuf_skb_stub() so that when the code
> at the error label calls dev_kfree_skb(skb); the skb will be NULL and
> nothing will happen since dev_kfree_skb() just does a return if passed a
> NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
I can't ascertain that this is exactly true.
For example, in isdn_writebuf_skb_stub() we have this:
if (ret > 0) {
...
if (dev->v110[idx]) {
...
if (ret == skb->len)
dev_kfree_skb(skb);
So if ret > 0 and we're doing V.110, we only free the skb
if isdn_v110_encode put a value at *((int *)nskb->data)
equal to skb->len.
So in the V.110 case it's not purely the ->writebuf_skb() return
value that gets returned, rather we return that integer that
isdn_v110_encode() put there.
Therefore I don't think this SKB leak is %100 correct. What did
I miss?
BTW, this ISDN code is rotting a bit and could use some cleanups if
not a rewrite. :-/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-15 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-08-12 20:48 Jesper Juhl
2006-08-15 9:00 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-08-15 9:08 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-08-15 9:15 ` David Miller
2006-08-15 10:42 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-08-15 16:06 ` Karsten Keil
2006-08-16 20:22 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-08-16 20:39 ` Karsten Keil
2006-08-16 20:44 ` David Miller
2006-08-16 20:48 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060815.020004.76775981.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=isdn4linux@listserv.isdn4linux.de \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=kai.germaschewski@gmx.de \
--cc=kkeil@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®