From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
akpm@osdl.org, mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,
nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:50:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061107095049.B3262@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0611070954210.3791@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>; from clameter@sgi.com on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:55:54AM -0800
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 09:55:54AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
>
> > Christoph, DECLARE_TASKLET that you had atleast needs to be per cpu..
> > Not sure if there are any other concerns.
>
> Nope. Tasklets scheduled and executed per cpu. These are the former bottom
> halves. See tasklet_schedule in kernel/softirq.c
You must be referring to __tasklet_schedule() ?
tasklet_schedule doesn't schedule if there is already one scheduled.
no?
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-07 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200611032205.kA3M5wmJ003178@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
2006-11-07 7:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-07 17:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 17:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-07 17:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 17:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2006-11-07 18:18 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 19:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 20:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-07 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 21:35 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-07 21:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 6:18 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-10 18:50 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 21:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-11 1:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-11 2:05 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-11 2:51 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 4:03 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-13 5:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-13 6:40 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-11-14 1:06 ` [patch] sched domain: move sched group allocations to percpu area Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-14 8:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-11-14 16:57 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-10 21:42 ` + sched-use-tasklet-to-call-balancing.patch added to -mm tree Ingo Molnar
2006-11-10 22:32 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2006-11-11 1:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 19:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-11-07 20:29 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061107095049.B3262@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome