mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fix a simple issue w.r.t mounting of containers
@ 2007-05-18 12:39 Balbir Singh
  2007-05-18 14:37 ` Paul Menage
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2007-05-18 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Menage; +Cc: Balbir Singh, Paul Jackson, LKML, Andrew Morton



Fix containers mounting issue. With the current v9 patches if a container
hierarchy is mounted and then umounted. A second mount of the hierarchy
fails

Steps to reproduce the problem

1. mount -t container container /<mnt point>
2. umount /<mnt point>
3. mount -t container container /<mnt point>

Step 3 fails with -EBUSY. This is due to the fact that when we unmount,
in container_put_super(), we need to delete the current root from the roots
list.

The patch below fixes the issue


Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 kernel/container.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff -puN kernel/container.c~fix-remount-issue kernel/container.c
--- linux-2.6.21-mm1/kernel/container.c~fix-remount-issue	2007-05-18 17:59:40.000000000 +0530
+++ linux-2.6.21-mm1-balbir/kernel/container.c	2007-05-18 18:00:02.000000000 +0530
@@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ static void container_put_super(struct s
 	ret = rebind_subsystems(root, 0);
 	BUG_ON(ret);
 
+	list_del(&root->root_list);
 	kfree(root);
 	mutex_unlock(&container_mutex);
 }
_

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix a simple issue w.r.t mounting of containers
  2007-05-18 12:39 [PATCH] Fix a simple issue w.r.t mounting of containers Balbir Singh
@ 2007-05-18 14:37 ` Paul Menage
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Paul Menage @ 2007-05-18 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Balbir Singh; +Cc: Paul Jackson, LKML, Andrew Morton

Thanks. I've added that to my tree.

Paul

On 5/18/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>
> Fix containers mounting issue. With the current v9 patches if a container
> hierarchy is mounted and then umounted. A second mount of the hierarchy
> fails
>
> Steps to reproduce the problem
>
> 1. mount -t container container /<mnt point>
> 2. umount /<mnt point>
> 3. mount -t container container /<mnt point>
>
> Step 3 fails with -EBUSY. This is due to the fact that when we unmount,
> in container_put_super(), we need to delete the current root from the roots
> list.
>
> The patch below fixes the issue
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>
>  kernel/container.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff -puN kernel/container.c~fix-remount-issue kernel/container.c
> --- linux-2.6.21-mm1/kernel/container.c~fix-remount-issue       2007-05-18 17:59:40.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.21-mm1-balbir/kernel/container.c  2007-05-18 18:00:02.000000000 +0530
> @@ -574,6 +574,7 @@ static void container_put_super(struct s
>         ret = rebind_subsystems(root, 0);
>         BUG_ON(ret);
>
> +       list_del(&root->root_list);
>         kfree(root);
>         mutex_unlock(&container_mutex);
>  }
> _
>
> --
>         Warm Regards,
>         Balbir Singh
>         Linux Technology Center
>         IBM, ISTL
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-05-18 14:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-18 12:39 [PATCH] Fix a simple issue w.r.t mounting of containers Balbir Singh
2007-05-18 14:37 ` Paul Menage

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®