mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	mingo@elte.hu, ak@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Zou,
	Nanhai" <nanhai.zou@intel.com>,
	"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	"Packard, Keith" <keith.packard@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 12:18:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070518191813.GC28957@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1wsz6ymyv.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 12:02:16PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> I will look closer but I do believe that from the ioapic to the cpu the 2.6.21
> code should be fairly robust with respect to inflight messages from the ioapic
> to the local apics and the cpus.  What I failed to consider were inflight
> messages in the other direction arriving out of order.

Yes. Inflight messages from cpu to ioapic was what I was referring to.

thanks,
suresh

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-18 19:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-17 23:03 Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-17 23:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18  0:43   ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18  0:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18  1:01   ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 14:40     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 17:30       ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:01         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 18:09           ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:20             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 18:07       ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 18:28         ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:39           ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 19:02             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 19:18               ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]
2007-05-31  2:50         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 12:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-18 14:19   ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 11:34 ` [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2) Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 12:01   ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 13:29     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 20:02       ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-31 13:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 13:50     ` [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v3) Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 13:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 20:00       ` Siddha, Suresh B

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070518191813.GC28957@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keith.packard@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nanhai.zou@intel.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome