mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nanhai.zou@intel.com,
	asit.k.mallick@intel.com, keith.packard@intel.com,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v3)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:00:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070531200008.GA17143@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1hcpt3xvh.fsf_-_@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>

On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:50:58AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> 
> On x86_64 kernel, level triggered irq migration gets initiated in the context
> of that interrupt(after executing the irq handler) and following steps are
> followed to do the irq migration.
> 
> 1. mask IOAPIC RTE entry;     // write to IOAPIC RTE
> 2. EOI;                       // processor EOI write
> 3. reprogram IOAPIC RTE entry // write to IOAPIC RTE with new destination and
>                               // and interrupt vector due to per cpu vector
>                               // allocation.
> 4. unmask IOAPIC RTE entry;   // write to IOAPIC RTE
> 
> Because of the per cpu vector allocation in x86_64 kernels, when the irq
> migrates to a different cpu, new vector(corresponding to the new cpu) will
> get allocated.
> 
> An EOI write to local APIC has a side effect of generating an EOI write
> for level trigger interrupts (normally this is a broadcast to all IOAPICs).
> The EOI broadcast generated as a side effect of EOI write to processor may
> be delayed while the other IOAPIC writes (step 3 and 4) can go through.
> 
> Normally, the EOI generated by local APIC for level trigger interrupt
> contains vector number. The IOAPIC will take this vector number and
> search the IOAPIC RTE entries for an entry with matching vector number and
> clear the remote IRR bit (indicate EOI). However, if the vector number is
> changed (as in step 3) the IOAPIC will not find the RTE entry when the EOI
> is received later. This will cause the remote IRR to get stuck causing the
> interrupt hang (no more interrupt from this RTE).
> 
> Current x86_64 kernel assumes that remote IRR bit is cleared by the time
> IOAPIC RTE is reprogrammed. Fix this assumption by checking for remote IRR
> bit and if it still set, delay the irq migration to the next interrupt
> arrival event(hopefully, next time remote IRR bit will get cleared
> before the IOAPIC RTE is reprogrammed).
> 
> Initial analysis and patch from Nanhai.
> 
> Clean up patch from Suresh.
> 
> Rewritten to be less intrusive, and to contain a big fat comment by Eric.

Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>

Thanks Eric.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-31 20:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-17 23:03 [patch] x86_64, irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-17 23:58 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18  0:43   ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18  0:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18  1:01   ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 14:40     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 17:30       ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:01         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 18:09           ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:20             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 18:07       ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 18:28         ` Yinghai Lu
2007-05-18 18:39           ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-18 19:02             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 19:18               ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-31  2:50         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-18 12:00 ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-18 14:19   ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 11:34 ` [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v2) Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 12:01   ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-31 13:29     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 20:02       ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-05-31 13:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 13:50     ` [PATCH] x86_64 irq: check remote IRR bit before migrating level triggered irq (v3) Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-31 13:54       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-31 20:00       ` Siddha, Suresh B [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070531200008.GA17143@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=keith.packard@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nanhai.zou@intel.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome