mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: clameter@sgi.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:39:22 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711141039.22758.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071114.031022.183117678.davem@davemloft.net>

On Wednesday 14 November 2007 22:10, David Miller wrote:
> From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:27:39 +1100
>
> > OK, in vanilla kernels, the page allocator definitely shows higher
> > in the results (than with Herbert's patch reverted).
>
>  ...
>
> > I can't see that these numbers show much useful, unfortunately.
>
> Thanks for all of this data Nick.
>
> So the thing that's being effected here in TCP is
> net/ipv4/tcp.c:select_size(), specifically the else branch:
>
> 	int tmp = tp->mss_cache;
>  ...
> 		else {
> 			int pgbreak = SKB_MAX_HEAD(MAX_TCP_HEADER);
>
> 			if (tmp >= pgbreak &&
> 			    tmp <= pgbreak + (MAX_SKB_FRAGS - 1) * PAGE_SIZE)
> 				tmp = pgbreak;
> 		}
>
> This is deciding, in 'tmp', how much linear sk_buff space to
> allocate.  'tmp' is initially set to the path MSS, which
> for loopback is 16K - the space necessary for packet headers.
>
> The SKB_MAX_HEAD() value has changed as a result of Herbert's
> bug fix.   I suspect this 'if' test is passing both with and
> without the patch.
>
> But pgbreak is now smaller, and thus the skb->data linear
> data area size we choose to use is smaller as well.

OK, that makes sense. BTW, are you taking advantage of kmalloc's
"quantization" into slabs WRT the linear data area? I wonder if
it would be at all useful...


> You can test if this is precisely what is causing the performance
> regression by using the old calculation just here in select_size().
>
> Add something like this local to net/ipv4/tcp.c:
>
> #define OLD_SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(X)	\
> 	(((X) - sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)) & \
> 	 ~(SMP_CACHE_BYTES - 1))
> #define OLD_SKB_MAX_ORDER(X, ORDER) \
> 	OLD_SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD((PAGE_SIZE << (ORDER)) - (X))
> #define OLD_SKB_MAX_HEAD(X)		(OLD_SKB_MAX_ORDER((X), 0))
>
> And then use OLD_SKB_MAX_HEAD() in select_size().

That brings performance back up!

I wonder why it isn't causing a problem for SLAB...

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-14 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-09 12:36 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers Nick Piggin
2007-11-09 15:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 17:49   ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 23:46     ` 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench Christoph Lameter
2007-11-10  1:29       ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-10  3:28         ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 19:44         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-13 11:41           ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14  1:58             ` David Miller
2007-11-13 17:36               ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14  6:12                 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 18:14                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14  6:37                     ` David Miller
2007-11-13 22:27                       ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 22:55                         ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 11:10                         ` David Miller
2007-11-13 23:39                           ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-11-14 11:48                           ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-14  0:02                             ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 12:10                               ` David Miller
2007-11-14 18:33                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-14 23:46                             ` David Miller
2007-11-15  0:21                               ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-15  0:27                                 ` David Miller
2007-11-15  1:03                               ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-15  1:11                                 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-15  1:47                                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 20:13 ` 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers Matt Mackall
2007-11-13 11:44   ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200711141039.22758.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®