From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 07:15:03 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711090712440.13823@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200711092336.56172.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8
> core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2,
> comparing slab vs slub allocators.
You saw the discussion at
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=119354245426072&w=2
and the patches / configurations that were posted to address the issues?
Could you try these?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-09 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-09 12:36 Nick Piggin
2007-11-09 15:15 ` Christoph Lameter [this message]
2007-11-09 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 23:46 ` 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench Christoph Lameter
2007-11-10 1:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-10 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 19:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-13 11:41 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 1:58 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 17:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 6:12 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 18:14 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 6:37 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 22:27 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 22:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 11:10 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 23:39 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 11:48 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-14 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 12:10 ` David Miller
2007-11-14 18:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-14 23:46 ` David Miller
2007-11-15 0:21 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-15 0:27 ` David Miller
2007-11-15 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-15 1:11 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-15 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 20:13 ` 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers Matt Mackall
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0711090712440.13823@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com \
--to=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®