From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:44:17 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711132244.17913.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071112201322.GX17536@waste.org>
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 07:13, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:36:56PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8
> > core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2,
> > comparing slab vs slub allocators.
>
> Damn your misleading subject! I thought this was going to be about
> something interesting.
Actually I did test slob as well -- it's competitive with slab and
slub up to about 4 cores, which is nice.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-13 23:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-09 12:36 Nick Piggin
2007-11-09 15:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 17:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-09 23:46 ` 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench Christoph Lameter
2007-11-10 1:29 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-10 3:28 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 19:44 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-13 11:41 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 1:58 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 17:36 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 6:12 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 18:14 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 6:37 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 22:27 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-13 22:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 11:10 ` David Miller
2007-11-13 23:39 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 11:48 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-14 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-14 12:10 ` David Miller
2007-11-14 18:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-14 23:46 ` David Miller
2007-11-15 0:21 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-15 0:27 ` David Miller
2007-11-15 1:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-15 1:11 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-15 1:47 ` Nick Piggin
2007-11-12 20:13 ` 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers Matt Mackall
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711132244.17913.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--to=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®