mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Micah Dowty <micah@vmware.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	Kyle Moffett <mrmacman_g4@mac.com>,
	Cyrus Massoumi <cyrusm@gmx.net>,
	LKML Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
	Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: High priority tasks break SMP balancer?
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:07:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071116060700.GD16273@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071116024408.GA20322@vmware.com>


* Micah Dowty <micah@vmware.com> wrote:

> > I am a bit at a loss as to how this could relate to the patch. This 
> > looks like a load balance logic issue that causes the load 
> > calculation to go wrong?
> 
> My best guess is that this has something to do with the timing with 
> which we sample the CPU's instantaneous load when calculating the load 
> averages.. but I still understand only the basics of the scheduler and 
> SMP balancer. All I really know for sure at this point regarding your 
> patch is that git-bisect found it for me.

hm, your code uses timeouts for this, right? The CPU load average that 
is used for SMP load balancing is sampled from the scheduler tick - and 
has been sampled from the scheduler tick for eons. v2.6.23 defaulted to 
a different method but v2.6.24 samples it from the tick again. So my 
guess is, your testcode behave similarly on 2.6.22 too, correct?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-16  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-09 22:34 Micah Dowty
2007-11-09 23:56 ` Cyrus Massoumi
2007-11-10  0:11   ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-14 18:39     ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-15 18:48     ` Kyle Moffett
2007-11-15 19:14       ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-15 20:07         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-15 20:24           ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-15 21:28             ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-15 21:35               ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-16  2:31                 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-16  2:44                   ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-16  6:07                     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-11-16  9:19                       ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-16 10:45                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-16 10:48                       ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-16 22:12                         ` Christoph Lameter
2007-11-16 10:48                       ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-16 22:14                         ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-16 23:26                           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-17  1:03                             ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-17 19:10                               ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-19 18:51                                 ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-19 22:22                                   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-19 23:05                                     ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-20  5:57                                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-11-20 18:06                                         ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-20 21:47                                           ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-22  7:46                                             ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-22 12:53                                               ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-26 19:44                                                 ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-27  9:21                                                   ` Dmitry Adamushko
2007-11-27 17:13                                                     ` Micah Dowty
2007-11-16 19:13         ` David Newall
2007-11-16 21:38           ` Micah Dowty

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071116060700.GD16273@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=cyrusm@gmx.net \
    --cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=micah@vmware.com \
    --cc=mrmacman_g4@mac.com \
    --cc=pwil3058@bigpond.net.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome