* 2.6.23.9 64-bit IRQ sharing without irqbalance with p35 vs i965?
@ 2007-12-08 23:44 Justin Piszcz
2007-12-09 0:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Justin Piszcz @ 2007-12-08 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Can some please explain with almost identical kernel .config's I see this
on a p965 Intel board:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 2501669875 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 8 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
7: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge parport0
8: 1 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 21187797 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042
16: 29096123 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi sata_sil24, uhci_hcd:usb3
17: 122 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata
18: 27177188 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi sata_sil24, ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb7
19: 29230654 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi sata_sil24, ohci1394, uhci_hcd:usb6
21: 41626956 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4, eth1
22: 203 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi HDA Intel
23: 108 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
377: 590862399 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge eth0
378: 89967666 0 0 0 PCI-MSI-edge ahci
NMI: 0 0 0 0
LOC: 2501568889 2501566748 2501569508 2501566435
ERR: 0
And this on a Gigabyte p35 chipset:
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
0: 4798363 4806242 4807103 4801203 IO-APIC-edge timer
1: 1 2 3 2 IO-APIC-edge i8042
6: 3 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge floppy
8: 0 0 0 1 IO-APIC-edge rtc
9: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi acpi
12: 22 32 26 33 IO-APIC-edge i8042
16: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ahci, uhci_hcd:usb3
17: 16994 17065 16955 16952 IO-APIC-fasteoi libata, eth0
18: 0 1 1 1 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci1394, ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb5, uhci_hcd:usb8
19: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb7
21: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi uhci_hcd:usb4
22: 38 39 40 38 IO-APIC-fasteoi HDA Intel
23: 0 0 0 0 IO-APIC-fasteoi ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb6
380: 6838702 6823411 6822704 6836873 PCI-MSI-edge ahci
NMI: 0 0 0 0
LOC: 18993695 18993662 18891135 18891030
ERR: 0
Both are running Debian Lenny (testing) with (almost the same exact kernel
configuration).
Why is this?
Justin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.23.9 64-bit IRQ sharing without irqbalance with p35 vs i965?
2007-12-08 23:44 2.6.23.9 64-bit IRQ sharing without irqbalance with p35 vs i965? Justin Piszcz
@ 2007-12-09 0:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2007-12-09 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Piszcz; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 18:44:39 -0500 (EST)
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> wrote:
> Can some please explain with almost identical kernel .config's I see
> this on a p965 Intel board:
your bios programmed the machines differently...
the p965 has the higher performing settup, but still it's recommended
to run the http://www.irqbalance.org program to spread interrupts around
--
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-09 0:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-12-08 23:44 2.6.23.9 64-bit IRQ sharing without irqbalance with p35 vs i965? Justin Piszcz
2007-12-09 0:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®