From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: "Bert Wesarg" <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Cc: travis@sgi.com, mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 07:49:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080410074904.2734e52f.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36ca99e90804090853xf62438ayfbfa6010f2d31747@mail.gmail.com>
Bert, responding to Mike:
> > It's printing the number of cpus on a node, so the number of nodes is not
> > important, it's how many cpus can fit on the head of a node... ;-)
> Ahh, the old code was Just Plain Wrong.
Looks like the code originally had NR_CPUS, and that was changed to
MAX_NUMNODES, perhaps as unintended collateral damage from some
x86_64 node SLIT changes done in the patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.10-rc3/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/broken-out/x86_64-add-x86_64-support-for-jack-steiners-slit-sysfs.patch
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.940.382.4214
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 18:43 [PATCH 0/3] x86: add " Mike Travis
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:36 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:44 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-10 14:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 17:24 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:40 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:46 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 15:53 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 12:49 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2008-04-10 0:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 12:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 14:05 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpumask: add show cpu map functions v2 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:32 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 17:39 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 0:29 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 6:05 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 14:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3 Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:54 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-10 15:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 17:51 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 20:39 ` Greg KH
2008-04-09 20:52 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 21:14 ` Greg KH
2008-04-09 21:21 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 20:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 21:02 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 21:15 ` Greg KH
2008-04-10 0:18 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 12:10 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 16:14 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 16:27 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 17:30 ` Greg KH
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Bert Wesarg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080410074904.2734e52f.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bert.wesarg@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome