From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Bert Wesarg <bert.wesarg@googlemail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo v3
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:44:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FBD915.7020809@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <36ca99e90804081236ifa3eecfue3dd211f9cdcb32a@mail.gmail.com>
Bert Wesarg wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>> --- linux-2.6.x86.sched.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.x86.sched/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_cacheinfo.c
>> @@ -591,20 +591,34 @@ static ssize_t show_size(struct _cpuid4_
>> return sprintf (buf, "%luK\n", this_leaf->size / 1024);
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t show_shared_cpu_map(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf, char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t show_shared_cpu_map_func(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf,
>> + int type, char *buf)
> I don't know if this is more efficient or better or cleaner, but how
> about to pass the function pointer (ie. cpulist_scnprintf or
> cpumap_scnprintf)? You safe at least one condition.
>
>> + n = type?
>> + cpulist_scnprintf(buf, len-2, *mask):
>> + cpumask_scnprintf(buf, len-2, *mask);
>
> Thanks.
> Bert
I have to subvert the cpumask interface a bit, but the resultant
code size is about 7 instructions smaller.
static ssize_t show_shared_cpu_map_func(struct _cpuid4_info *this_leaf,
int (*cpumap_func)(char *, int, const cpumask_t *, int),
char *buf)
{
ptrdiff_t len = PTR_ALIGN(buf + PAGE_SIZE - 1, PAGE_SIZE) - buf;
int n = 0;
if (len > 1) {
cpumask_t *mask = &this_leaf->shared_cpu_map;
n = cpumap_func(buf, len-2, mask, NR_CPUS);
buf[n++] = '\n';
buf[n] = '\0';
}
return n;
}
static inline ssize_t show_shared_cpu_map(struct _cpuid4_info *leaf, char *buf)
{
return show_shared_cpu_map_func(leaf, &__cpumask_scnprintf, buf);
}
static inline ssize_t show_shared_cpu_list(struct _cpuid4_info *leaf, char *buf)
{
return show_shared_cpu_map_func(leaf, &__cpulist_scnprintf, buf);
}
Btw, you were asking about how to determine NR_CPUS. Here's one way:
root@newton:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/online
0-2,4-7
root@newton:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible
0-511
root@newton:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/present
0-7
root@newton:~# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/system
0-4095
Thanks,
Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-08 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-08 18:43 [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: modify show_shared_cpu_map in intel_cacheinfo v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:36 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:44 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-04-10 14:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 17:24 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 13:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpumask: use new cpus_scnprintf function v3 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:40 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:46 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 15:53 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 12:49 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 0:32 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 12:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 14:05 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 18:43 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpumask: add show cpu map functions v2 Mike Travis
2008-04-08 19:32 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:52 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 17:39 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 0:29 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 6:05 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 14:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-08 19:33 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86: add cpus_scnprintf function v3 Bert Wesarg
2008-04-08 20:54 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-10 15:03 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-09 17:51 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 20:39 ` Greg KH
2008-04-09 20:52 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 21:14 ` Greg KH
2008-04-09 21:21 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 20:59 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-09 21:02 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-09 21:15 ` Greg KH
2008-04-10 0:18 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 12:10 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 16:14 ` Bert Wesarg
2008-04-10 16:27 ` Paul Jackson
2008-04-10 17:30 ` Greg KH
2008-04-10 17:36 ` Bert Wesarg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FBD915.7020809@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bert.wesarg@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome