From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Siewior <linux-crypto@ml.breakpoint.cc>
Cc: hskinnemoen@atmel.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au,
davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shannon.nelson@intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add include/asm-avr32/xor.h
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 01:01:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080414220129.GH26885@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080414214640.GA2282@Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc>
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 11:46:40PM +0200, Sebastian Siewior wrote:
> * Adrian Bunk | 2008-04-14 21:15:36 [+0300]:
>
> >> >601f75e99c076c16e2648f4860cac4fc6ce187ea diff --git a/include/asm-avr32/xor.h b/include/asm-avr32/xor.h
> >> >new file mode 100644
> >> >index 0000000..99c87aa
> >> >--- /dev/null
> >> >+++ b/include/asm-avr32/xor.h
> >> >@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> >> >+#ifndef _ASM_XOR_H
> >> >+#define _ASM_XOR_H
> >> >+
> >> >+#include <asm-generic/xor.h>
> >> >+
> >> >+#endif
> >>
> >> What about providing <linux/xor.h> which includes the right file from
> >> asm/ or asm-generic/ depending on HAVE_.* ?
> >
> >Where's the advantage?
>
> This week you are going through avr32. The same fixup is required for
> blackfin or cris if my ls isn't lying.
Could be, these arre the two archs I did for different reasons not
include when I tried allmodconfig on all archs.
> So either you fix every arch
> with this missing include or you provide a generic include and every
> arch that provides a private xor.h includes it. From what I can see
> almost every arch includes the generic except for x86 & sparc
You didn't see that the following architectures also have their own
versions:
- alpha
- arm
- ia64
- sparc64
> so most
> xor.h files are identical copies and this is probably as bad as a
> trailing white space :)
I'm not sure whether it's worth spending my time discussing whether
adding a config variable to 6 architectures is really better than
adding trivial headers to 3 architectures...
> Sebastian
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-14 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-14 14:16 Adrian Bunk
2008-04-14 18:11 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-14 18:15 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-04-14 21:46 ` Sebastian Siewior
2008-04-14 21:50 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-14 22:01 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-04-14 22:11 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-14 22:27 ` Dan Williams
2008-04-14 22:30 ` Mike Frysinger
2008-04-14 23:45 ` Dan Williams
2008-04-15 0:47 ` Mike Frysinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080414220129.GH26885@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hskinnemoen@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@ml.breakpoint.cc \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shannon.nelson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®