Re: Suspend/Resume bug in PCI layer wrt quirks

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 10:16:30PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 16 of May 2008, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 15, 2008 12:51 pm Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > Some quirks should be called with interrupt disabled, we can't directly
> > > call them in .resume_early. Also the patch introduces
> > > pci_fixup_resume_early and pci_fixup_suspend, which matches current
> > > device core callbacks (.suspend/.resume_early).
> > >
> > > TBD: Somebody knows why we need quirk resume should double check if a
> > > quirk should be called in resume or resume_early. I changed some per my
> > > understanding, but can't make sure I fixed all.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > 
> > I applied this one to linux-next, it should fix some of the problems people 
> > have been seeing at least...
> 
> Well, that will collide with
> pm-new-suspend-and-hibernation-callbacks-for-pci-bus-type.patch
> in the Greg's tree.
> 
> Greg, perhaps it's better if you drop it and I'll send an updated version to
> Jesse?  That will make his tree dependent on yours, but that will be okay,
> won't it?

That's up to Jesse.  I don't know if he can handle a depancy on an
external tree.

Jesse?