mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 13:27:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080524112704.GA7292@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4837E89D.9040008@goop.org>

On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 11:06:21AM +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:42:58PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >  
> >>Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> >>    
> >>>>*However*, the best would really be if we changed Kconfig to emit 
> >>>>configuration constants what were 0/1 instead of undefined/defined. 
> >>>>That way we could do:
> >>>>
> >>>>	if (CONFIG_SOMETHING && foo) {
> >>>>		/* ... something ... */
> >>>>	} else if ((mode & S_IWUGO) == 0) {
> >>>>		/* ... */
> >>>>        
> >>>We could do that - but then it would need another
> >>>name not to clash with all the places where we rely
> >>>on CONFIG_FOO='n' => CONFIG_FOO is not defined.
> >>>
> >>>We could teach kconfig to emit something like:
> >>>#define KFOO 0   (for the 'n' value)
> >>>And 1 or 2 for the y and m values.
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>I don't think we want to use "1 or 2"... I suspect we want to use the 
> >>same booleans we currently have.
> >>    
> >I'm a bit dense (or I need more coffe - it's morning here).
> >What "same booleans"?
> >  
> 
> They should be plain 0/1 booleans.  For a bool/tristate option FOO, it 
> would define:
> 
> Enabled y:
> 
>    #define CONFIG_FOO
>    #define CFG_FOO   1
>    #undef CONFIG_FOO_MODULE
>    #define CFG_FOO_MODULE 0
Agreed

> 
> Enabled m:
> 
>    #define CONFIG_FOO
>    #define CFG_FOO   1
>    #define CONFIG_FOO_MODULE
>    #define CFG_FOO_MODULE 1

I assume you wanted to say:
>    #undef  CONFIG_FOO
>    #define CFG_FOO   1
>    #define CONFIG_FOO_MODULE
>    #define CFG_FOO_MODULE 1
Because then the CONFIG_* is not changed
and we do not want to change that.

I'm not fully convinced about:
>    #define CFG_FOO   1
But on the other hand it is only in odd
cases we distingush between built-in and module.
So it makes most sense.

> Disabled n:
> 
>    #undef CONFIG_FOO
>    #define CFG_FOO   0
>    #undef CONFIG_FOO_MODULE
>    #define CFG_FOO_MODULE 0
Agree.

> 
> Not sure what CFG_* should be for string/numeric options.  Probably "1" 
> if the value is defined, "0" if not, with CONFIG_* being the actual 
> value (so a CONFIG_ value of 0 is distinguishable from not defined).
For non-boolean/tristate values we simply skip CFG_ values - thats
the most simple approach.

	Sam

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-05-24 11:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-23 19:11 Steve French
2008-05-23 20:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-23 20:49   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-23 21:05     ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-23 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24  5:43   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24  5:42     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24  6:42       ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 10:06         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 10:49           ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 11:27           ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2008-05-24 14:35             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 14:39               ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-24 14:41                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 14:46                   ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-24 15:36               ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 15:45                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 15:57                   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-24 16:02                     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 16:40                       ` Tom Spink
2008-05-24 16:42                         ` Tom Spink
2008-05-24 20:38                         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:43                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 20:51                             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:54                               ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 21:15                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-25 23:57                                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-26  0:27                                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 18:12                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 18:12                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 18:51                   ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 18:08         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080524112704.GA7292@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®