From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] quota: Split out quota_struct.h out of quota.h
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 18:26:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080604152647.GA4189@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080604145130.GC16572@duck.suse.cz>
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 04:51:30PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 04-06-08 16:56:24, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 07:11:10PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>...
> > > --- a/include/linux/quota.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/quota.h
> > > @@ -37,13 +37,11 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > > #include <linux/types.h>
> > > +#include <linux/quota_struct.h>
> > >...
> >
> > This breaks our userspace headers.
> >
> > Please always run "make headers_check" after touching #include's
> > under include/
> I didn't know this existed :) I'll use it in future. Thanks. The question
> is how to fix this. Probably the best would be if didn't have to export new
> header file, wouldn't it? We can split the headers into quota.h containing
> structures and all other userspace stuff and quota_func.h carrying other
> kernel-internal stuff like inline functions etc. Oh well...
Considering that quota.h #include's quota_struct.h it wouldn't be a
problem if the new header also gets exported to userspace.
At least I do not have any strong opinion regarding how to best organize
the quota headers - David (Cc'ed) might have a more input on this.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-04 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-02 17:11 Cleanup quota header files Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:11 ` [PATCH] quota: Rename quota functions from upper case, make bigger ones non-inline Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:11 ` [PATCH] quota: Remove use of info_any_dirty() Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:11 ` [PATCH] ext4: Add explicit include of <linux/quota.h> into ext4_jbd2.h Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:11 ` [PATCH] ext2: Add explicit include of <linux/quota.h> into super.c Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:11 ` [PATCH] quota: Split out quota_struct.h out of quota.h Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:11 ` [PATCH] quota: Convert macros to inline functions Jan Kara
2008-06-04 13:56 ` [PATCH] quota: Split out quota_struct.h out of quota.h Adrian Bunk
2008-06-04 14:51 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-04 15:26 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2008-06-04 15:38 ` David Woodhouse
2008-06-04 17:57 ` Jan Kara
2008-06-02 17:41 ` [PATCH] quota: Remove use of info_any_dirty() Vegard Nossum
2008-06-03 9:03 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080604152647.GA4189@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®