mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: vegard.nossum@gmail.com, vegardno@ifi.uio.no
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jgarzik@pobox.com, adobriyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] netconsole: avoid deadlock on printk from driver code
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:37:49 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080813.033749.165504341.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813095324.GA15055@ben.ifi.uio.no>

From: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:53:24 +0200

> [PATCH] netconsole: avoid deadlock on printk from driver code
> 
> I encountered a hard-to-debug deadlock when I pulled out the plug of my
> RealTek 8139 which was also running netconsole: The driver wants to print
> a "link down" message. However, this triggers netconsole, which wants to
> print the message using the same device. Here is a backtrace:

See my other reply, this is absolutely the wrong way to go about
this.

You only have two sane options:

1) Defer the link status printk message into a deferred context,
   such as a workqueue, so that you can do it outside of the
   lock.

2) Do your locking differently so that the link status handling
   locking does not bisect the locking used for packet transmit
   in ->hard_start_xmit().

#2 is the reason why most other drivers don't have this silly
bug, they don't hold TX path locks when handling link status
and printing out such messages.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-08-13 10:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-13  9:53 Vegard Nossum
2008-08-13  9:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-08-13 10:21   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-13 10:29   ` David Miller
2008-08-13 10:44     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-13 10:56       ` David Miller
2008-08-13 10:37 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-08-14 13:28   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-14 13:44     ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-08-14 22:15       ` David Miller
2008-08-20 17:54         ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-08-20 19:56           ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-20 20:58           ` David Miller
2008-08-14 22:13     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080813.033749.165504341.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
    --cc=vegardno@ifi.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®