From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: penberg@cs.helsinki.fi
Cc: vegard.nossum@gmail.com, vegardno@ifi.uio.no,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
jgarzik@pobox.com, adobriyan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] netconsole: avoid deadlock on printk from driver code
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:13:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080814.151331.114224935.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84144f020808140628m31d6d099t1fecdb1701c0bbdc@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:28:37 +0300
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 1:37 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> > 2) Do your locking differently so that the link status handling
> > locking does not bisect the locking used for packet transmit
> > in ->hard_start_xmit().
> >
> > #2 is the reason why most other drivers don't have this silly
> > bug, they don't hold TX path locks when handling link status
> > and printing out such messages.
>
> Yeah, that works for the link status case, but not for things like the
> printks in rtl8139_tx_interrupt()... Hmm.
Note that netconsole specifically does trylock on the netdev
xmit lock specifically to handle this case.
If you could command the TX path solely under this generic lock
already provided by the generic networking, you could avoid this
deadlock as well.
This is yet another reason many other drivers don't get hit by
this problem. The solution is built into netpoll but it only
works if you use the provided generic locking mechanisms to
mutex the driver's TX path.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-14 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 9:53 Vegard Nossum
2008-08-13 9:59 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-08-13 10:21 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-13 10:29 ` David Miller
2008-08-13 10:44 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-13 10:56 ` David Miller
2008-08-13 10:37 ` David Miller
2008-08-14 13:28 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-08-14 13:44 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-08-14 22:15 ` David Miller
2008-08-20 17:54 ` Pekka J Enberg
2008-08-20 19:56 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-08-20 20:58 ` David Miller
2008-08-14 22:13 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080814.151331.114224935.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
--cc=vegardno@ifi.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®