mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Suresh B Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vatsa <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	David Collier-Brown <davecb@sun.com>,
	Tim Connors <tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/8] sched: convert BALANCE_FOR_xx_POWER to inline functions
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:26:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081218175602.29812.66863.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081218175313.29812.4781.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com>

BALANCE_FOR_MC_POWER and similar macros defined in sched.h are
not constants and have various condition checks and significant
amount of code that is not suitable to be contain in a macro.
Also there could be side effects on the expressions passed to
some of them like test_sd_parent().

This patch converts all complex macros related to power savings
balance to inline functions.

Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

 include/linux/sched.h    |   33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 include/linux/topology.h |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 55e30d1..311122f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -764,15 +764,23 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
 #define SD_SERIALIZE		1024	/* Only a single load balancing instance */
 #define SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR	2048	/* Gain latency sacrificing cache hit */
 
-#define BALANCE_FOR_MC_POWER	\
-	(sched_smt_power_savings ? SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE : 0)
+extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
+
+static inline int sd_balance_for_mc_power(void)
+{
+	if (sched_smt_power_savings)
+		return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
 
-#define BALANCE_FOR_PKG_POWER	\
-	((sched_mc_power_savings || sched_smt_power_savings) ?	\
-	 SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE : 0)
+	return 0;
+}
 
-#define test_sd_parent(sd, flag)	((sd->parent &&		\
-					 (sd->parent->flags & flag)) ? 1 : 0)
+static inline int sd_balance_for_package_power(void)
+{
+	if (sched_mc_power_savings | sched_smt_power_savings)
+		return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
+
+	return 0;
+}
 
 
 struct sched_group {
@@ -1358,6 +1366,15 @@ struct task_struct {
 	struct list_head	*scm_work_list;
 };
 
+/* Test a flag in parent sched domain */
+static inline int test_sd_parent(struct sched_domain *sd, int flag)
+{
+	if (sd->parent && (sd->parent->flags & flag))
+		return 1;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Priority of a process goes from 0..MAX_PRIO-1, valid RT
  * priority is 0..MAX_RT_PRIO-1, and SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH
@@ -2215,8 +2232,6 @@ __trace_special(void *__tr, void *__data,
 extern long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const cpumask_t *new_mask);
 extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumask_t *mask);
 
-extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
-
 extern void normalize_rt_tasks(void);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED
diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 117f1b7..7f10439 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ void arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
 				| SD_WAKE_AFFINE	\
 				| SD_WAKE_BALANCE	\
 				| SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES\
-				| BALANCE_FOR_MC_POWER,	\
+				| sd_balance_for_mc_power(),\
 	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
 	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
 }
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
 				| SD_BALANCE_FORK	\
 				| SD_WAKE_AFFINE	\
 				| SD_WAKE_BALANCE	\
-				| BALANCE_FOR_PKG_POWER,\
+				| sd_balance_for_package_power(),\
 	.last_balance		= jiffies,		\
 	.balance_interval	= 1,			\
 }


  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-18 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-18 17:55 [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan [this message]
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] sched: Framework for sched_mc/smt_power_savings=N Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] sched: favour lower logical cpu number for sched_mc balance Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] sched: nominate preferred wakeup cpu Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-19 21:55   ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:19     ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:27       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:31         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19 22:38           ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-19 22:54             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20  4:36     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20  4:44       ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-20  7:54         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-20 10:02         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:36           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-20 10:56             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-21  8:46               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] sched: bias task wakeups to preferred semi-idle packages Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:11   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] sched: activate active load balancing in new idle cpus Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] sched: add SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE at MC and CPU level for sched_mc>0 Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 17:56 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] sched: idle_balance() does not call load_balance_newidle() Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-18 18:12   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-18 20:17     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:19 ` [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n Ingo Molnar
2008-12-18 20:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-19  8:29     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19  8:24   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-19 13:34   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-29 23:43 ` MinChan Kim
2008-12-30  2:48   ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30  6:21     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30  6:44       ` Balbir Singh
2008-12-30  7:20         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-30 18:07       ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02  7:26         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-02 22:16           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-03  7:29             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-03 10:16               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-03 11:22                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 15:00                   ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-04 18:19                     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-04 19:52                       ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05  3:20                         ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-05  4:40                           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05  6:36                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-05 15:19                               ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06  9:31                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 15:07                                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-06 17:48                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 18:45                                       ` Balbir Singh
2009-01-07  8:59                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 11:26                                           ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-07 14:36                                             ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-07 15:35                                               ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-08  8:06                                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-08 17:46                                                   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2009-01-09  6:00                                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2009-01-06 14:54                             ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2008-12-30 17:31     ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081218175602.29812.66863.stgit@drishya.in.ibm.com \
    --to=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=davecb@sun.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tconnors@astro.swin.edu.au \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®