From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, vegard.nossum@gmail.com, mingo@elte.hu,
stable@kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix lazy vmap purging (use-after-free error)
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:59:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090223115926.ed03e954.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090223193057.GL6751@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:30:57 -0800
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:10:09AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:17:26 -0800 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:29:36AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > On Monday 23 February 2009 16:17:09 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > The boot CPU runs in the context of its idle thread during boot-up.
> > > > > During this time, idle_cpu(0) will always return nonzero, which will
> > > > > fool Classic and Hierarchical RCU into deciding that a large chunk of
> > > > > the boot-up sequence is a big long quiescent state. This in turn causes
> > > > > RCU to prematurely end grace periods during this time.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch creates a new global variable that is set to 1 just before
> > > > > the boot CPU first enters the scheduler, after which the idle task
> > > > > really is idle.
> > > >
> > > > Nice work all (btw. if this patch goes in rather than using system_state,
> > > > then please make the variable __read_mostly).
> > >
> > > Hmmm... I misread this and made system_state be __read_mostly. Let
> > > me know if this is bad, easy to fix if needed.
> >
> > Please don't use system_state. The whole thing is just bad design.
> > It's a global variable, breaks encapsulation, creates interactions etc.
> > CS-101 stuff.
>
> OK. Would it help if I wrapped an accessor function around system_state?
That doesn't help the core problem: system_state creates interactions
between unrelated subsystems. And the number of interactions grows
exponentially with the number of subsystems which use system_state.
> I do need some sort of global state if I am to solve this problem. ;-)
As I suggested before, please add a new state variable which is private
to your subsystem. That way it remains isolated from other subsystems.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-23 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 13:41 Vegard Nossum
2009-02-20 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 13:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-20 14:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 14:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-20 15:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-20 14:51 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-20 15:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-20 16:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 16:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-20 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 17:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-20 23:51 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-21 1:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-21 9:30 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-21 17:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-21 18:08 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-21 18:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-21 18:37 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-22 3:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 5:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 8:24 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-23 15:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-23 9:17 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-23 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-23 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 13:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-23 16:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 17:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-23 19:10 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-23 19:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 19:59 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-02-23 20:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 20:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-23 19:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-23 20:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-23 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-23 20:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-23 20:43 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-24 3:23 ` Nick Piggin
2009-02-24 3:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-21 19:21 ` Vegard Nossum
2009-02-20 16:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-20 16:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-02-20 15:56 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090223115926.ed03e954.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome