mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:31:43 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090414163143.GB12888@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239724300-16371-2-git-send-email-James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>

[James Bottomley - Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 10:51:27AM -0500]
| Not having apics, Voyager can't use the default apic implementation of
| these, it has to read from a special port in the VIC to get the
| processor ID, so abstract these functions in smp_ops to allow voyager
| to live simultaneously with the apic code.
| 
| Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
| ---
|  arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h  |   13 +++++++++++--
|  arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c |    5 -----
|  arch/x86/kernel/apic/ipi.c  |    2 +-
|  arch/x86/kernel/smp.c       |    7 +++++++
|  arch/x86/xen/smp.c          |    7 +++++++
|  5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
| 
| diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
| index 19e0d88..aac866f 100644
| --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
| +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/smp.h
| @@ -60,6 +60,8 @@ struct smp_ops {
|  
|  	void (*send_call_func_ipi)(const struct cpumask *mask);
|  	void (*send_call_func_single_ipi)(int cpu);
| +	int (*hard_smp_processor_id)(void);
| +	int (*safe_smp_processor_id)(void);
|  };
|  
|  /* Globals due to paravirt */
| @@ -159,7 +161,11 @@ extern unsigned disabled_cpus __cpuinitdata;
|   * so this is correct in the x86 case.
|   */
|  #define raw_smp_processor_id() (percpu_read(cpu_number))
| -extern int safe_smp_processor_id(void);
| +int apic_safe_smp_processor_id(void);
| +static inline int safe_smp_processor_id(void)
| +{
| +	return smp_ops.safe_smp_processor_id();
| +}
|  
|  #elif defined(CONFIG_X86_64_SMP)
|  #define raw_smp_processor_id() (percpu_read(cpu_number))
| @@ -185,7 +191,10 @@ static inline int logical_smp_processor_id(void)
|  
|  #endif
|  
| -extern int hard_smp_processor_id(void);
| +static inline int hard_smp_processor_id(void)
| +{
| +	return smp_ops.hard_smp_processor_id();
| +}
|  

Hi James, wouldn't it break summit32 platform?
This snippet from summit_32.c

static void summit_init_apic_ldr(void)
{
	unsigned long val, id;
	int count = 0;
--->	u8 my_id = (u8)hard_smp_processor_id();
	u8 my_cluster = APIC_CLUSTER(my_id);

if we have CONFIG_SMP _not_ set smp_ops.hard_smp_processor_id
would be plain NULL deref (or linker warning)? I could be missing something...
 
        Cyrill

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-14 15:51 [PATCH 00/14] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51 ` [PATCH 01/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51   ` [PATCH 02/14] [VOYAGER] x86/mca: make mca_nmi_hook external James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51     ` [PATCH 03/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add prefill_possible_map to x86_quirks James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51       ` [PATCH 04/14] [VOYAGER] x86: use boot_cpu_id instead of zero for checking boot processor James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51         ` [PATCH 05/14] [VOYAGER] x86/voyager: Move voyager detection to a new bootparam area James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51           ` [PATCH 06/14] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file setup_arch.h James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51             ` [PATCH 07/14] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file entry_arch.h James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51               ` [PATCH 08/14] [VOYAGER] x86: eliminate subarchitecture file do_timer.h James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51                 ` [PATCH 09/14] [VOYAGER] x86: redo irq2 cascade setup James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51                   ` [PATCH 10/14] [VOYAGER] x86: make disabling the apics functional instead of a flag James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51                     ` [PATCH 11/14] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: add missing QIC call function single gate James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51                       ` [PATCH 12/14] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: replace inline io area reads with readX accessors James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51                         ` [PATCH 13/14] [VOYAGER] x86/voyager: remove direct use of pg0 in favour of early_ioremap() James Bottomley
2009-04-14 15:51                           ` [PATCH 14/14] [VOYAGER] x86/Voyager: Plumb voyager back into the build James Bottomley
2009-04-14 17:09                     ` [PATCH 10/14] [VOYAGER] x86: make disabling the apics functional instead of a flag Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-14 17:44                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-15 12:51                         ` James Bottomley
2009-04-15 14:12                           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-04-14 16:31   ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-04-14 16:54     ` [PATCH 01/14] [VOYAGER] x86: add {safe,hard}_smp_processor_id to smp_ops James Bottomley
2009-04-14 16:35   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-14 16:57     ` James Bottomley
2009-04-14 16:27 ` [PATCH 00/14] convert voyager over to the x86 quirks model Joe Perches
2009-04-14 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 18:08   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-14 23:12     ` James Bottomley
2009-04-15 15:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-16 21:06         ` James Bottomley
2009-04-16 20:54     ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-19 23:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-19 23:54         ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-20  0:38           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-20 16:59         ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090414163143.GB12888@lenovo \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®