From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com>,
Douglas Leeder <douglas.leeder@sophos.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"malware-list@dmesg.printk.net" <malware-list@dmesg.printk.net>,
"Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu" <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>,
"greg@kroah.com" <greg@kroah.com>,
"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>,
"tytso@mit.edu" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"arjan@infradead.org" <arjan@infradead.org>,
"david@lang.hm" <david@lang.hm>,
"jengelh@medozas.de" <jengelh@medozas.de>,
"aviro@redhat.com" <aviro@redhat.com>,
"mrkafk@gmail.com" <mrkafk@gmail.com>,
"alexl@redhat.com" <alexl@redhat.com>,
"hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>,
"alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"mmorley@hcl.in" <mmorley@hcl.in>
Subject: Re: fanotify - overall design before I start sending patches
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 12:34:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090808103445.GB9978@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1249582695.20644.35.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com>
Hi!
> > By the above you're hosed anyway since starting a new one will fail due
> > to there being no daemon, right? Might as well forfeit all security
> > measures once the daemon dies. That is let security depend on there
> > being a daemon connected.
>
> Nope. You should stop calling and thinking of it as a security system.
> As I've said multiple times it is at best an indexing and integrity
> checking system. We fail open. We don't prevent or care about
> malicious local attacks. When a group is evicted everything is going to
> just work. The whole reason for the timeout is because I don't trust
> userspace not to get it wrong and I'd rather not lose my box because of
> it. Yes, the reset I'm proposing allows userspace to screw the
Well, if you are using this for hierarchical storage, then this daemon
will bring the system down.
Face it, you _are_ developing a security system; otherwise features of
fanotify do not make sense. (And you are developing _bad_ security
system).
So... what about just scrapping the open vetoing -- at least from
initial version?
> > Seems like a weird thing to me, suppose you DoS the system on purpose
> > and all clients start getting wonky, you kill them all, and are left
> > with non, then you cannot access any of your files anymore and
> > everything grinds to a halt?
>
> Nope, you DoS the system on purpose all the listeners get evicted, now
> everything else will be able to open/read data without those listeners
> paying attention. When a group is evicted it's evicted. It no longer
> needs to say yes or no.
Yes so I hammer your web server and you loose your antivirus
protection.
> > Like said, having the filesystem block actions based on external
> > processes seems just asking for trouble.
>
> Or it seems like exactly what hierarchical storage management systems
> want....
Timeout does not make sense for hierarchical storage.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-08 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-24 20:13 Eric Paris
2009-07-24 20:48 ` david
2009-07-24 21:01 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-24 21:44 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-27 17:52 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-07-29 20:11 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-24 21:00 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-07-24 21:21 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-24 22:42 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-07-24 23:01 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-24 22:48 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-24 23:25 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-24 23:46 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-24 23:49 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-25 0:29 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-27 18:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-07-27 19:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-07-28 17:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-07-29 20:14 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-29 20:12 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-29 20:07 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-27 16:54 ` Jan Kara
2009-07-25 14:22 ` Niraj kumar
2009-07-29 20:08 ` Eric Paris
2009-07-28 11:48 ` Jon Masters
2009-07-29 20:20 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-03 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-03 16:55 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-03 18:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-03 18:13 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-04 16:09 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-04 16:27 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-04 16:39 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-04 17:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-08-04 18:20 ` John Stoffel
2009-08-04 18:50 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-05 9:32 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-04 16:34 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-05 10:12 ` Douglas Leeder
2009-08-05 10:35 ` Douglas Leeder
2009-08-05 2:05 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-05 16:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-06 10:10 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 10:20 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-06 10:24 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-06 10:20 ` Douglas Leeder
2009-08-06 10:22 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-07 8:59 ` Jamie Lokier
2009-08-06 10:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 10:59 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-06 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-08-06 12:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2009-08-06 12:58 ` Alan Cox
2009-08-06 18:18 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-06 13:50 ` Kernel Event Notification Subsystem (was: fanotify - overall design before I start sending patches) Al Boldi
2009-08-06 18:18 ` fanotify - overall design before I start sending patches Eric Paris
2009-08-07 16:36 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-08-07 17:43 ` Eric Paris
2009-08-08 10:36 ` Pavel Machek
2009-08-10 10:03 ` Miklos Szeredi
2009-08-08 10:34 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2009-08-06 11:24 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090808103445.GB9978@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=alexl@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=aviro@redhat.com \
--cc=david@lang.hm \
--cc=douglas.leeder@sophos.com \
--cc=eparis@redhat.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jengelh@medozas.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=malware-list@dmesg.printk.net \
--cc=mmorley@hcl.in \
--cc=mrkafk@gmail.com \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@sophos.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®