mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@fifo99.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: fix false errors due to macro concatenation
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:46:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090930174612.GE2957@shadowen.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253585691-10987-1-git-send-email-dwalker@fifo99.com>

On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 07:14:47PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> The macro concatenation (##) sequence can cause false errors when checking
> macro's. Checkpatch doesn't currently know about the operator.
> 
> For example this line,
> 
> + 	entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data;                   \
> 
> is correct but it produces the following error,
> 
> ERROR: need consistent spacing around '*' (ctx:WxB)
> +       entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data;\
>                                           ^
> 
> The line above doesn't have any spacing problems, and if you remove the
> macro concatenation sequence checkpatch doesn't give any errors. This change
> resolves this by just always removing "##" in every line checked.

Ok, just removing these characters in the conversion changes the
relative length of the converted form and breaks position reporting for
other checks, for instance if I stupidly convert the ## to # so its
still invalid we then get this:

+	entry = (struct ftrace_raw_##call *)raw_data; \

It is probabally more correct to include this <ident> ## <ident> form in
the definition of an identifier.  I've respun this patch to do just that
and it looks like its working as we would hope.

I will get this tested properly and add it to my next batch.

Perhaps you could test the version at the url below and see if it works
better:

  http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/apw/checkpatch/checkpatch.pl-testing

NOTE: you want at least version 0.29-5-* which is in the process of
mirroring out.

-apw

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-09-30 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-22  2:14 Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14 ` [PATCH 2/5] checkpatch: fix hang in relative indent checking Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14   ` [PATCH 3/5] checkpatch: add a blacklist Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14     ` [PATCH 4/5] checkpatch: fix __attribute__ matching Daniel Walker
2009-09-22  2:14       ` [PATCH 5/5] checkpatch: fix false EXPORT_SYMBOL warning Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 17:46         ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-10-01 14:28           ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-02  7:39             ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-09-30 17:46       ` [PATCH 4/5] checkpatch: fix __attribute__ matching Andy Whitcroft
2009-10-01 14:26         ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-02  7:43           ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-09-22  6:29     ` [PATCH 3/5] checkpatch: add a blacklist Li Zefan
2009-09-30 15:27       ` Andy Whitcroft
2009-10-01 14:18         ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-06 19:51           ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-06 20:50           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07  3:52             ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 10:17               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07 14:26                 ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 14:44                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07 14:57                     ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 15:11                       ` Alan Cox
2009-10-07 15:41                         ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 15:52                           ` Alan Cox
2009-10-07 16:11                             ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 15:08                   ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-07 15:38                     ` Daniel Walker
2009-10-07 21:30                       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-10-07 21:58                         ` Daniel Walker
2009-09-30 15:24   ` [PATCH 2/5] checkpatch: fix hang in relative indent checking Andy Whitcroft
2009-09-30 17:46 ` Andy Whitcroft [this message]
2009-10-01 14:20   ` [PATCH 1/5] checkpatch: fix false errors due to macro concatenation Daniel Walker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090930174612.GE2957@shadowen.org \
    --to=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dwalker@fifo99.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome