From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
hjl.tools@gmail.com, peter.lachner@intel.com
Subject: Re: [patch v3 2/2] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:56:06 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100212035606.119B3C821@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Suresh Siddha's message of Thursday, 11 February 2010 11:51:00 -0800 <20100211195614.886724710@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Note that this patch and the xstate user_regset patch are entirely independent.
They can me merged in any order or one without the other.
> +/*
> + * Generic ptrace interface that exports the architecture specific regsets
> + * using the corresponding NT_* types (which are also used in the core dump).
There is a special case here, which I think already works as we intend it
to, but which should be clarified in the comment about this API. The
NT_PRSTATUS note type in a core dump contains a full 'struct elf_prstatus'.
But the user_regset for NT_PRSTATUS contains just the elf_gregset_t that
is the pr_reg field of 'struct elf_prstatus'.
For all the other user_regset flavors, the user_regset layout and the ELF
core dump note payload are exactly the same layout, as your comment implies.
> +static int ptrace_regset(struct task_struct *task, int req, unsigned int type,
> + struct iovec *kiov)
> +{
> + const struct user_regset_view *view = task_user_regset_view(task);
> + const struct user_regset *regset = find_regset(view, type);
> + int regset_no;
> +
> + if (!regset || (kiov->iov_len % regset->size) != 0)
> + return -EIO;
My inclination would be to diagnose these more specifically. For a bad
size, give -EINVAL. For an unknown regset type, give maybe -EINVAL or
maybe -ENODEV. (-ENODEV is what you get for a known NT_* type that has a
user_regset implemented in the kernel, but that the particular hardware
we're running on doesn't support. So perhaps you don't want to overload
that for a wholly unrecognized NT_* type.)
Otherwise, looks good to me. ACK contingent on Oleg's ACK.
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-12 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 19:50 [patch v3 0/2] updated ptrace/core-dump patches for supporting xstate - v3 Suresh Siddha
2010-02-11 19:50 ` [patch v3 1/2] x86, ptrace: regset extensions to support xstate Suresh Siddha
2010-02-11 23:18 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-12 3:45 ` [patch v3 1/2] " Roland McGrath
2010-02-12 17:31 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-02-11 19:51 ` [patch v3 2/2] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET Suresh Siddha
2010-02-11 23:19 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] " tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2010-02-22 9:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-22 9:33 ` linux-next requiements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET) Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-22 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-22 11:47 ` linux-next requirements " Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-22 22:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-22 23:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-23 20:20 ` Roland McGrath
2010-02-23 20:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-02-23 22:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-23 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-23 19:52 ` Al Viro
2010-02-23 19:57 ` Al Viro
2010-02-24 7:25 ` linux-next requirements Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-27 1:53 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-27 8:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-02-27 9:09 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2010-02-27 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-27 12:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-27 12:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-27 19:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-27 21:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2010-02-27 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-28 7:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28 12:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-28 7:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28 7:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-28 7:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28 8:19 ` Al Viro
2010-02-28 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-28 10:26 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-02-28 7:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-03-01 15:13 ` Nick Bowler
2010-03-03 21:53 ` Pavel Machek
2010-03-04 0:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 0:42 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-04 1:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-04 2:48 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-02-22 18:37 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET Roland McGrath
2010-02-23 18:36 ` [tip:x86/ptrace] parisc: Disable CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK tip-bot for Roland McGrath
2010-02-12 3:56 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2010-02-12 15:59 ` [patch v3 2/2] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100212035606.119B3C821@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.lachner@intel.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®