From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.jf.intel.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ego@in.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] sched: change nohz idle load balancing logic to push model
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:19:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519091933.GA30741@isilmar-3.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF1C595.3070707@crca.org.au> <20100517182726.089700767@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
Hey,
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:27:26AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> This is an updated version of patchset which is posted earlier at
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/10/470
>
> Description:
> Existing nohz idle load balance logic uses the pull model, with one
> idle load balancer CPU nominated on any partially idle system and that
> balancer CPU not going into nohz mode. With the periodic tick, the
> balancer does the idle balancing on behalf of all the CPUs in nohz mode.
>
> This is not very optimal and has few issues:
> * the balancer will continue to have periodic ticks and wakeup
> frequently (HZ rate), even though it may not have any rebalancing to do on
> behalf of any of the idle CPUs.
> * On x86 and CPUs that have APIC timer stoppage on idle CPUs, this periodic
> wakeup can result in an additional interrupt on a CPU doing the timer
> broadcast.
>
> The alternative is to have a push model, where all idle CPUs can enter nohz
> mode and any busy CPU kicks one of the idle CPUs to take care of idle
> balancing on behalf of a group of idle CPUs.
>
> Following patches switches idle load balancer to this push approach.
>
> Updates from the previous version:
>
> * Busy CPU uses send_remote_softirq() for invoking SCHED_SOFTIRQ on the
> idle load balancing cpu, which does the load balancing on behalf of
> all the idle CPUs.
>
> * Dropped the per NUMA node nohz load balancing as it doesn't detect
> certain imbalance scenarios. This will be addressed later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
This patchset works good on my notebook; the number of wakeups decreases
from ~2.5 to ~1.6 when booting with init=/bin/bash, disabling cursor
blinking and enabling USB autosuspend.
Thanks and best,
Dominik
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-19 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-17 18:27 Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 1/7] softirq: Add a no local fallback option to send_remote_softirq Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 2/7] softirq: add init_remote_softirq_csd() Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 3/7] softirq: avoid softirq_work_list for SCHED_SOFTIRQ when sent remotely Suresh Siddha
2010-05-20 8:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-20 8:14 ` David Miller
2010-05-20 8:23 ` Jens Axboe
2010-05-20 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-20 9:18 ` David Miller
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 4/7] sched: Change nohz ilb logic from pull to push model Suresh Siddha
2010-06-01 23:47 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-06-02 22:27 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 5/7] sched: Change select_nohz_load_balancer to return void Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 6/7] sched: change nohz.load_balancer to be nr_cpu_ids based Suresh Siddha
2010-05-20 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 7/7] timers: use nearest busy cpu for migrating timers from an idle cpu Suresh Siddha
2010-06-01 23:37 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-06-02 22:02 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 22:39 ` [patch 0/7] sched: change nohz idle load balancing logic to push model Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-19 9:19 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2010-05-20 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-22 0:09 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-05-31 9:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-09 10:13 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Change " tip-bot for Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-20 11:07 ` [patch 0/7] sched: change " Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-20 11:17 ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-05-20 11:35 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-20 12:13 ` Dominik Brodowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100519091933.GA30741@isilmar-3.linta.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=arjan@linux.jf.intel.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome