mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.jf.intel.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	ego@in.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/7] sched: change nohz idle load balancing logic to push model
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:19:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100519091933.GA30741@isilmar-3.linta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4BF1C595.3070707@crca.org.au> <20100517182726.089700767@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>

Hey,

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:27:26AM -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> This is an updated version of patchset which is posted earlier at
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/10/470
> 
> Description:
> Existing nohz idle load balance logic uses the pull model, with one
> idle load balancer CPU nominated on any partially idle system and that
> balancer CPU not going into nohz mode. With the periodic tick, the
> balancer does the idle balancing on behalf of all the CPUs in nohz mode.
> 
> This is not very optimal and has few issues:
> * the balancer will continue to have periodic ticks and wakeup
>   frequently (HZ rate), even though it may not have any rebalancing to do on
>   behalf of any of the idle CPUs.
> * On x86 and CPUs that have APIC timer stoppage on idle CPUs, this periodic
>   wakeup can result in an additional interrupt on a CPU doing the timer
>   broadcast.
> 
> The alternative is to have a push model, where all idle CPUs can enter nohz
> mode and any busy CPU kicks one of the idle CPUs to take care of idle
> balancing on behalf of a group of idle CPUs.
> 
> Following patches switches idle load balancer to this push approach.
> 
> Updates from the previous version:
> 
> * Busy CPU uses send_remote_softirq() for invoking SCHED_SOFTIRQ on the
>   idle load balancing cpu, which does the load balancing on behalf of
>   all the idle CPUs.
> 
> * Dropped the per NUMA node nohz load balancing as it doesn't detect
>   certain imbalance scenarios. This will be addressed later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>

This patchset works good on my notebook; the number of wakeups decreases
from ~2.5 to ~1.6 when booting with init=/bin/bash, disabling cursor
blinking and enabling USB autosuspend.

Thanks and best,
	Dominik

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-19  9:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-17 18:27 Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 1/7] softirq: Add a no local fallback option to send_remote_softirq Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 2/7] softirq: add init_remote_softirq_csd() Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 3/7] softirq: avoid softirq_work_list for SCHED_SOFTIRQ when sent remotely Suresh Siddha
2010-05-20  8:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-20  8:14     ` David Miller
2010-05-20  8:23       ` Jens Axboe
2010-05-20  8:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-20  9:18         ` David Miller
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 4/7] sched: Change nohz ilb logic from pull to push model Suresh Siddha
2010-06-01 23:47   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-06-02 22:27     ` Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 5/7] sched: Change select_nohz_load_balancer to return void Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 6/7] sched: change nohz.load_balancer to be nr_cpu_ids based Suresh Siddha
2010-05-20  9:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-17 18:27 ` [patch 7/7] timers: use nearest busy cpu for migrating timers from an idle cpu Suresh Siddha
2010-06-01 23:37   ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2010-06-02 22:02     ` Suresh Siddha
2010-05-17 22:39 ` [patch 0/7] sched: change nohz idle load balancing logic to push model Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-19  9:19   ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2010-05-20 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-05-22  0:09   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-05-31  9:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-06-09 10:13     ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Change " tip-bot for Venkatesh Pallipadi
2010-05-20 11:07 ` [patch 0/7] sched: change " Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-20 11:17   ` Dominik Brodowski
2010-05-20 11:35     ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-05-20 12:13       ` Dominik Brodowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100519091933.GA30741@isilmar-3.linta.de \
    --to=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
    --cc=arjan@linux.jf.intel.com \
    --cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=venki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome