From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.35-rc4 - CONFIG_LOCALVERSION ignored?
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 23:25:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201007052325.56971.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikoCiIoo4nfmoFGBMOkc4lNKTU_ouE15EmV1j-h@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday, July 05, 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hey everybody, there's finally a new -rc out there..
>
> I've been back online for a week, and at least judging by the kinds of
> patches and pull requests I've been getting, I have to say that I
> think that having been strict for -rc3 ended up working out pretty
> well. The diffstat of rc3..rc4 looks quite reasonable, despite the
> longer window between rc's. And while there were certainly some things
> that needed fixing, I'm hoping that we'll have a timely 2.6.35 release
> despite my vacation (my longest time away from the kernel in many
> years, I do believe - I followed email on a cellphone, but did not a
> single kernel compile, and had a great time under water).
>
> So go out and test -rc4. It fixes a number of regressions, a couple of
> them harking back to from before 2.6.34. Networking, cfq, i915 and
> radeo. And filesystem writeback performance issues, etc. It's all
> good.
Hmm. Am I dong anything particularly wrong, or is CONFIG_LOCALVERSION ignored
now, as it seems?
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-05 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-05 3:44 Linux 2.6.35-rc4 Linus Torvalds
2010-07-05 8:55 ` [regression] Crash in wb_clear_pending() (was: Linux 2.6.35-rc4) Ingo Molnar
2010-07-05 16:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-05 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-05 17:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-05 18:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-05 19:24 ` [regression] Crash in wb_clear_pending() Jens Axboe
2010-07-05 19:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-05 19:45 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-05 21:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2010-07-05 23:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-06 6:25 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-06 6:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-06 6:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-06 6:50 ` Jens Axboe
2010-07-06 6:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-07-07 1:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-05 10:22 ` Linux 2.6.35-rc4 Xiaotian Feng
2010-07-09 21:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-05 21:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2010-07-05 0:39 ` linux-next: build failure after merge of the kbuild-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-05 21:43 ` Linux 2.6.35-rc4 - CONFIG_LOCALVERSION ignored? Michal Marek
2010-07-06 18:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-07-07 1:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-07-12 16:58 ` Benny Halevy
2010-07-12 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-07-12 17:34 ` Benny Halevy
2010-07-09 14:21 ` Yet another 2.6.35 regression (AGP)? Woody Suwalski
2010-07-09 15:58 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-09 16:27 ` Woody Suwalski
2010-07-09 17:49 ` Jesse Barnes
2010-07-12 15:28 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201007052325.56971.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome