From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
andi.kleen@intel.com, stable@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't apply for write lock on tasklist_lock if parent doesn't ptrace other processes
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:24:46 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100722192446.E1258400B8@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Oleg Nesterov's message of Thursday, 22 July 2010 11:05:24 +0200 <20100722090524.GA6647@redhat.com>
> So, this list_empty() check needs taskslit at least for reading. But, we
> are going to take it for writing right after exit_ptrace() returns, afaics
> we can add this fastpatch check for free.
That looks good to me, but it could use some more scare comments.
> /*
> - * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
> + * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on. Called with tasklist held.
* Called with tasklist held for writing, and returns with it held too.
* But note it can release and reacquire the lock.
> + write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> +
/*
* Note that exit_ptrace() might drop tasklist_lock and reacquire it.
*/
> exit_ptrace(father);
>
> - write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
> reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-22 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-15 6:51 Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-15 19:53 ` David Rientjes
2010-07-21 21:49 ` Andrew Morton
2010-07-21 22:25 ` Roland McGrath
2010-07-22 9:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-22 19:24 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2010-07-23 17:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-23 8:45 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-23 17:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-26 5:05 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-26 8:53 ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-26 9:40 ` Kleen, Andi
2010-07-27 1:15 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2010-07-29 15:12 ` [PATCH] ptrace: optimize exit_ptrace() for the likely case Oleg Nesterov
2010-07-29 17:40 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100722192446.E1258400B8@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®