mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct reclaim path completely
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 17:44:59 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110323174545.1AE2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110323082423.GA1969@barrios-desktop>

> > Boo.
> > You seems forgot why you introduced current all_unreclaimable() function.
> > While hibernation, we can't trust all_unreclaimable.
> 
> Hmm. AFAIR, the why we add all_unreclaimable is when the hibernation is going on,
> kswapd is freezed so it can't mark the zone->all_unreclaimable.
> So I think hibernation can't be a problem.
> Am I miss something?

Ahh, I missed. thans correct me. Okay, I recognized both mine and your works.
Can you please explain why do you like your one than mine?

btw, Your one is very similar andrey's initial patch. If your one is
better, I'd like to ack with andrey instead.



  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-23  8:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-15  1:49 Linux 2.6.38 Linus Torvalds
2011-03-15  3:13 ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15  4:06   ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-15  4:14   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-15  4:29     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15  4:33   ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-15  4:50     ` David Rientjes
2011-03-15  6:21       ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-16  9:09         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-22 11:04           ` [patch 0/5] oom: a few anti fork bomb patches KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-22 11:05             ` [PATCH 1/5] vmscan: remove all_unreclaimable check from direct reclaim path completely KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-22 14:49               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-23  5:21                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-23  6:59                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-23  7:13                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-23  8:24                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-23  8:44                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-03-23  9:02                           ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  2:11                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  2:21                               ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-24  2:48                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  3:04                                   ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-24  5:35                                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  4:19                               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  5:35                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  5:53                                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  6:16                                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  6:32                                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  7:03                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  7:25                                           ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  7:28                                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  7:34                                               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  7:41                                                 ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24  7:43                                                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24  7:43                                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-23  7:41               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-23  7:55                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-22 11:08             ` [PATCH 3/5] oom: create oom autogroup KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-22 23:21               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-23  1:27                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-23  2:41                   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-03-22 11:08             ` [PATCH 4/5] mm: introduce wait_on_page_locked_killable KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-23  7:44               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-24 15:04               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-22 11:09             ` [PATCH 5/5] x86,mm: make pagefault killable KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-23  7:49               ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-03-23  8:09                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-23 14:34                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-24 15:10               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-24 17:13               ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-24 17:34                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-28  7:00                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
     [not found]             ` <20110322200657.B064.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
     [not found]               ` <20110323164229.6b647004.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
2011-03-23 13:40                 ` [PATCH 2/5] Revert "oom: give the dying task a higher priority" Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2011-03-24  0:06                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-24 15:27               ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-28  9:48                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-28 12:28                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-28  9:51                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 12:21                   ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-28 12:28                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 12:40                       ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-28 13:10                         ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2011-03-28 13:18                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-28 13:56                             ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
2011-03-29  2:46                             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-03-28 13:48                           ` Minchan Kim
2011-03-15 21:08       ` Linux 2.6.38 Oleg Nesterov
2011-03-15  3:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-03-15  4:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-03-16 17:30 ` i915/kms regression after 2.6.38-rc8 (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38) Melchior FRANZ
2011-03-16 19:22   ` i915/kms regression after 2.6.38-rc8 Jiri Slaby
2011-03-16 19:43   ` i915/kms regression after 2.6.38-rc8 (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38) Chris Wilson
2011-03-16 21:09     ` i915/kms regression after 2.6.38-rc8 Melchior FRANZ
2011-03-20 18:30   ` i915/kms regression after 2.6.38-rc8 (was: Re: Linux 2.6.38) Maciej Rutecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110323174545.1AE2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=avagin@openvz.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®