From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed
Date: Mon, 2 May 2011 19:55:23 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502195657.2D68.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110502194416.2D61.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
The rule is, we have to update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed too if we change
tsk->cpus_allowed. Otherwise RT scheduler may confuse.
This patch fixes it.
btw, system_state checking is very important. current boot sequence is (1) smp_init
(ie secondary cpus up and created cpu bound kthreads). (2) sched_init_smp().
Then following bad scenario can be happen,
(1) cpuup call notifier(CPU_UP_PREPARE)
(2) A cpu notifier consumer create FIFO kthread
(3) It call kthread_bind()
... but, now secondary cpu haven't ONLINE
(3) schedule() makes fallback and cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback
change task->cpus_allowed
(4) find_lowest_rq() touch local_cpu_mask if task->rt.nr_cpus_allowed != 1,
but it haven't been initialized.
RCU folks plan to introduce such FIFO kthread and our testing hitted the
above issue. Then this patch also protect it.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
include/linux/cpuset.h | 1 +
kernel/cpuset.c | 1 +
kernel/sched.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
index f20eb8f..42dcbdc 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
@@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ static inline void cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct task_struct *p,
static inline int cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *p)
{
cpumask_copy(&p->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_mask);
+ p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(&p->cpus_allowed);
return cpumask_any(cpu_active_mask);
}
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 1ceeb04..6e5bbe8 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -2220,6 +2220,7 @@ int cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(struct task_struct *tsk)
cpumask_copy(&tsk->cpus_allowed, cpu_possible_mask);
cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_active_mask);
}
+ tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed = cpumask_weight(&tsk->cpus_allowed);
return cpu;
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index fd4625f..bfcd219 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -2352,6 +2352,10 @@ static int select_fallback_rq(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
if (dest_cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
return dest_cpu;
+ /* Don't worry. It's temporary mismatch. */
+ if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING)
+ return cpu;
+
/* No more Mr. Nice Guy. */
dest_cpu = cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(p);
/*
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 14:20 [RFC PATCH] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 10:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:55 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-05-11 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13 5:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 6:42 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13 7:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 7:43 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13 9:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-14 11:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 13:37 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 8:54 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-15 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 13:26 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19 6:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-28 16:35 ` [tip:sched/urgent] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(), " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21 9:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 8:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 22:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-19 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched, cpuset: introduce do_set_cpus_allowed() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110502195657.2D68.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®