mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: yong.zhang0@gmail.com
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl,
	oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@elte.hu, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
	miaox@cn.fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:06:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DD4B358.3080705@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110516132623.GA2058@zhy>

Hi Paul,

I've made new patch. Is this acceptable to you?


==============================================================
While discussing cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() fix, we've found
rcu subsystem don't use kthread_bind() correctly.

The detail is, typical subsystem wake up a kthread at CPU_ONLINE
notifier (ie. _after_ cpu is onlined), but rcu subsystem wake up
a kthread at CPU_UP_PREPARE notifier (ie. _before_ cpu is onlined).
Because otherwise RCU grace periods in CPU_ONLINE notifiers will
never complete.

This makes big different result. if we fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(),
sched load balancer run before scheduler smp initialize and makes
kernel crash. (see below)

   kernel_init();
     smp_init();
       _cpu_up();
         __cpu_notify(CPU_UP_PREPARE | mod, hcpu, -1, &nr_calls);
           rcu_cpu_notify();
             rcu_online_kthreads();
               rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread();
                 wake_up_process();
                   try_to_wake_up();
                     select_task_rq();
                       select_fallback_rq();
                         cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback();
                           /* here the rcu_thread's cpus_allowed will
			   * be set to cpu_possible_mask, but now
			   * we only have the boot cpu online, so it
			   * will run on the boot cpu p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed
			   * will be set to cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask);
			   */
               sched_setscheduler_nocheck(t, SCHED_FIFO, &sp);
                 __sched_setscheduler();
                   check_class_changed();
                     p->sched_class->switched_to(rq, p); /* rt_class */
                       push_rt_task();
                         find_lock_lowest_rq();
                           find_lowest_rq();
			   /* crash here because local_cpu_mask is uninitialized */

The right way is, explicit two phase cpu bindings (1) bind boot
(or any other online) cpu at CPU_UP_PREPARE (2) bind correct
target cpu at CPU_ONLINE. This patch does it.

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
  kernel/rcutree.c |   11 +++++++++--
  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 5616b17..924b0cd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1645,6 +1645,7 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread(int cpu)
  {
  	struct sched_param sp;
  	struct task_struct *t;
+	int bound_cpu;

  	if (!rcu_kthreads_spawnable ||
  	    per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) != NULL)
@@ -1652,8 +1653,14 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread(int cpu)
  	t = kthread_create(rcu_cpu_kthread, (void *)(long)cpu, "rcuc%d", cpu);
  	if (IS_ERR(t))
  		return PTR_ERR(t);
-	kthread_bind(t, cpu);
-	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_cpu, cpu) = cpu;
+	/*
+	 * The target cpu isn't online yet and can't be bound the rcuc kthread.
+	 * Thus we bind it to another online cpu temporary.
+	 * rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop() rebind it to target cpu later.
+	 */
+	bound_cpu = cpumask_any(cpu_online_mask);
+	kthread_bind(t, bound_cpu);
+	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_cpu, cpu) = bound_cpu;
  	WARN_ON_ONCE(per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) != NULL);
  	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) = t;
  	wake_up_process(t);
-- 
1.7.3.1




  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-19  6:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-28 14:20 [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 10:42   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:55     ` [PATCH 1/2] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-11 16:05       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13  5:48         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  6:42           ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  7:33             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13  7:43               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13  9:34                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 17:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-14 11:17               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 13:37               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19  8:45                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:54                   ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-15 18:55             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 13:26               ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19  6:06                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-05-19  6:08                   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-28 16:35                     ` [tip:sched/urgent] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(), " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20 10:20                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21  9:54                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  8:34                   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19  8:50                     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19  9:41                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:12                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 11:41                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 22:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-19  8:55                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-02 10:56     ` [PATCH 2/2] sched, cpuset: introduce do_set_cpus_allowed() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 12:58     ` [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4DD4B358.3080705@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome