From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 18:34:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DCCFB37.9040001@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTik38FinwfSJr5eS40-v6te6-3PR1w@mail.gmail.com>
(2011/05/13 16:43), Yong Zhang wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:33 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
> <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>>>>> (3) schedule() makes fallback and cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback
>>>>>> change task->cpus_allowed
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm failing to see how this is happening, surely that kthread isn't
>>>>> actually running that early?
>>>>
>>>> If my understand correctly, current call graph is below.
>>>>
>>>> kernel_init()
>>>> smp_init();
>>>> cpu_up()
>>>> ... cpu hotplug notification
>>>> kthread_create()
>>>> sched_init_smp();
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So, cpu hotplug event is happen before sched_init_smp(). The old rule is,
>>>> all kthreads of using cpu-up notification have to use kthread_bind(). It
>>>> protected from sched load balance.
>>>>
>>>> but, now cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() forcedly change kthread's
>>>> cpumask.
>>>> Why is this works? the point are two.
>>>>
>>>> - rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop() call set_cpus_allowed_ptr() again
>>>> periodically.
>>>> then, it can reset cpumask if cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() change it.
>>>> my debug print obseve following cpumask change occur at boot time.
>>>> 1) kthread_bind: bind cpu1
>>>> 2) cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback: bind possible cpu
>>>> 3) rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop: rebind cpu1
>>>> - while tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1, sched load balancer never be crash.
>>>
>>> Seems rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread() call wake_up_process() directly,
>>> which is under hotplug event CPU_UP_PREPARE. Maybe it should be
>>> under CPU_ONLINE.
>>
>> Hmm..
>>
>> I haven't catch your point. cpu_up() call both CPU_UP_PREPARE and CPU_ONLINE
>> notification. Thus, CPU_ONLINE still be called before sched_init_smp().
>
> The difference is that CPU_ONLINE will set cpu_online_mask and cpu_active_mask,
> so wake_up_process()->ttwu()->select_task_rq() will not go back to
> cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback().
Right. Thank you. Now I got your point!
> But the comments for rcu_cpu_kthread_should_stop() shot me, since
> rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread() must be called under CPU_UP_PREPARE
> for some reason.
>
> Maybe we should find a more suitable way for your issue :)
ok, I'll try to read and understand rcu-kthread design and find it out.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-13 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 14:20 [RFC PATCH] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-04-28 16:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-05-02 10:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] " KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-11 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-13 5:48 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 6:42 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13 7:33 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-13 7:43 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-13 9:34 ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
2011-05-13 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-14 11:17 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-16 13:37 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 8:54 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-15 18:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-16 13:26 ` Yong Zhang
2011-05-19 6:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 6:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-28 16:35 ` [tip:sched/urgent] cpuset: Fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback(), " tip-bot for KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-20 10:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-21 9:54 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 8:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rcu: don't bind offline cpu Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 8:50 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 9:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-19 10:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-19 11:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-20 22:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-19 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-02 10:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] sched, cpuset: introduce do_set_cpus_allowed() helper function KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-05-02 12:58 ` [RFC PATCH] cpuset: fix cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() don't update tsk->rt.nr_cpus_allowed Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DCCFB37.9040001@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome