From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davej@redhat.com,
kees.cook@canonical.com, davem@davemloft.net, eranian@google.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, adobriyan@gmail.com,
penberg@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 14:07:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110520120750.GJ14745@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1305852966.3005.19.camel@dan>
* Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> wrote:
> I was able to boot a relocatable kernel with the decompression location at a
> hard-coded offset without too much trouble. Everything seems to work fine.
Nice!
> However, it occurred to me that even if the kernel image's base address were
> randomized at boot, assuming a binary distro kernel it would still be
> possible to sidt the address of the IDT and calculate symbol offsets relative
> to that. Any thoughts on how to avoid that? Seems difficult. Another hurdle
> will be to find a reasonable source of entropy that early in the boot
> process.
I do not think it's an issue.
If an attacker can execute arbitrary privileged instructions like SIDT then
it's game over. There's plenty of CPU state, the IDT, GDT, various MSRs that
would tell roughly where the kernel is, etc.
The attack randomization protects against is when the attacker has a limited
amount of control over a stack return address (due to a buffer overflow for
example) and can redirect kernel execution to some 'interesting' place that
allows more control. With SMEP and kernel image randomization this would be
rather difficult to pull off: the kernel wont jump to a pre-prepared user-space
shellcode buffer (due to SMEP) while the location of already existing,
executable, supervisor-privileged pages is randomized.
So when you have implemented this i'd suggest enabling CONFIG_X86_PTDUMP=y to
get access to a dump of all pagetables, in the /debug/kernel_page_tables file.
There you can check every single executable, kernel-privileged mapping on a
live system and make sure it's not easily discovered.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-20 12:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1305292059.1949.0.camel@dan>
2011-05-13 13:29 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-16 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 16:14 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 0:56 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2011-05-20 12:54 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20 17:41 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-20 18:27 ` Kees Cook
2011-05-20 18:34 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 18:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-22 6:11 ` david
2011-05-20 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-22 18:45 ` Dan Rosenberg
[not found] ` <BANLkTik1SK_kWVvGsKk0SqdByQ5-0b5nFg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-23 0:25 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-23 0:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-23 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-23 19:02 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-23 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 1:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-24 4:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 14:48 Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 18:06 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 18:37 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 19:01 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 19:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 6:12 ` Kees Cook
2011-05-13 6:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 20:24 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-05-12 21:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-12 20:43 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 21:07 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:30 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 22:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 22:07 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 22:15 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-13 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-17 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110520120750.GJ14745@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome