From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 16:48:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTim8mAzZbdOhBodaOFKM5esP-Q+K7g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I think there is a serious problem with kernel symbol correlation
with the latest perf in 2.6.39-rc7-tip.
Here is a simple example with a stupid program that only
does open()/close on /dev/null:
$ perf record -e cycles:k openclose
$ perf report --stdio
# Events: 2K cycles
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ......... ................ ...............
#
99.76% openclose [binfmt_misc] [k] 0xffffffff81010fe6
0.13% openclose libc-2.12.1.so [.] __open_nocancel
0.09% openclose libc-2.12.1.so [.] __GI_close
The DSO (binfmt_misc) is bogus. That's not where time is spent.
But if I ran the same test as root:
$ sudo perf record -e cycles:k openclose
$ sudo perf report --stdio
# Events: 2K cycles
#
# Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ ......... ................. .............................
#
17.13% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] __lock_acquire
11.77% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_sched_clock
7.36% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sched_clock_local
5.99% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_release
5.38% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] local_clock
4.43% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_acquired
4.05% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_acquire
3.95% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] lock_is_held
3.51% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] sched_clock_cpu
3.24% openclose [kernel.kallsyms] [k] trace_hardirqs_off_caller
This is much more meaningful.
This is not related to the paranoid level (1 for me).
Looking at perf report -D, the same kernel address is associated to different
module based on my permission level.
first perf.data:
416749738927 0x4210 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 4886/4886:
0xffffffff8107c1d8 period: 2262681
... thread: openclose:4886
...... dso: /lib/modules/2.6.39-rc7-tip/kernel/fs/binfmt_misc.ko
second perf.data:
436879910722 0xc950 [0x28]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 1): 4894/4894:
0xffffffff8107c1d8 period: 2280253
... thread: openclose:4894
...... dso: vmlinux
Same address different mapping!
My path to vmlinux is all accessible to me.
If there were permission problems, I would expect perf record or perf report
to tell me and not fallback to some bogus mappings.
next reply other threads:[~2011-05-12 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-12 14:48 Stephane Eranian [this message]
2011-05-12 18:06 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 18:37 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 19:01 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 19:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-13 6:12 ` Kees Cook
2011-05-13 6:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-05-12 20:24 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2011-05-12 21:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 20:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-12 20:43 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 21:00 ` [PATCH] vsprintf: Turn kptr_restrict off by default Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:08 ` David Miller
2011-05-12 21:07 ` [BUG] perf: bogus correlation of kernel symbols Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:30 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:56 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 22:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 22:07 ` Dave Jones
2011-05-12 22:15 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-13 9:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 8:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-13 16:23 ` Andi Kleen
2011-05-17 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 21:41 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-05-12 21:54 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <1305292059.1949.0.camel@dan>
2011-05-13 13:29 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-16 15:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-16 16:14 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 0:56 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20 12:54 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 13:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20 17:41 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 18:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-20 18:27 ` Kees Cook
2011-05-20 18:34 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-20 18:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-20 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-22 6:11 ` david
2011-05-20 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-22 18:45 ` Dan Rosenberg
[not found] ` <BANLkTik1SK_kWVvGsKk0SqdByQ5-0b5nFg@mail.gmail.com>
2011-05-23 0:25 ` Dan Rosenberg
2011-05-23 0:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-05-23 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-23 19:02 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-23 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-24 1:59 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-05-24 4:06 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=BANLkTim8mAzZbdOhBodaOFKM5esP-Q+K7g@mail.gmail.com \
--to=eranian@google.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome