From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anton Arapov <anton@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] uprobes/x86: Cleanup the single-stepping code
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:39:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121028173931.GA14652@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121028173900.GA14621@redhat.com>
No functional changes.
Now that default arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() helpers do nothing,
x86 has no reason to reimplement them. Change arch_uprobe_*_xol() hooks
to do the necessary work and remove the x86-specific hooks.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 54 +++++++++++++++-----------------------------
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index aafa555..c71025b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -478,6 +478,11 @@ int arch_uprobe_pre_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
regs->ip = current->utask->xol_vaddr;
pre_xol_rip_insn(auprobe, regs, autask);
+ autask->saved_tf = !!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF);
+ regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF;
+ if (test_tsk_thread_flag(current, TIF_BLOCKSTEP))
+ set_task_blockstep(current, false);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -603,6 +608,16 @@ int arch_uprobe_post_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
if (auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_CALL)
result = adjust_ret_addr(regs->sp, correction);
+ /*
+ * arch_uprobe_pre_xol() doesn't save the state of TIF_BLOCKSTEP
+ * so we can get an extra SIGTRAP if we do not clear TF. We need
+ * to examine the opcode to make it right.
+ */
+ if (utask->autask.saved_tf)
+ send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
+ else if (!(auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_SETF))
+ regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
+
return result;
}
@@ -647,6 +662,10 @@ void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
current->thread.trap_nr = utask->autask.saved_trap_nr;
handle_riprel_post_xol(auprobe, regs, NULL);
instruction_pointer_set(regs, utask->vaddr);
+
+ /* clear TF if it was set by us in arch_uprobe_pre_xol() */
+ if (!utask->autask.saved_tf)
+ regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
}
/*
@@ -676,38 +695,3 @@ bool arch_uprobe_skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
send_sig(SIGTRAP, current, 0);
return ret;
}
-
-void arch_uprobe_enable_step(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
-{
- struct task_struct *task = current;
- struct arch_uprobe_task *autask = &task->utask->autask;
- struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(task);
-
- autask->saved_tf = !!(regs->flags & X86_EFLAGS_TF);
-
- regs->flags |= X86_EFLAGS_TF;
- if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_BLOCKSTEP))
- set_task_blockstep(task, false);
-}
-
-void arch_uprobe_disable_step(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe)
-{
- struct task_struct *task = current;
- struct arch_uprobe_task *autask = &task->utask->autask;
- bool trapped = (task->utask->state == UTASK_SSTEP_TRAPPED);
- struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(task);
- /*
- * The state of TIF_BLOCKSTEP was not saved so we can get an extra
- * SIGTRAP if we do not clear TF. We need to examine the opcode to
- * make it right.
- */
- if (unlikely(trapped)) {
- if (!autask->saved_tf)
- regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
- } else {
- if (autask->saved_tf)
- send_sig(SIGTRAP, task, 0);
- else if (!(auprobe->fixups & UPROBE_FIX_SETF))
- regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
- }
-}
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 17:39 [PATCH 0/4] uprobes: Kill arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() hooks Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-28 17:39 ` [PATCH 1/4] uprobes/powerpc: Don't clear TIF_UPROBE in do_notify_resume() Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-29 5:27 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-10-29 7:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-29 12:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-29 13:28 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-11-02 5:02 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-28 17:39 ` [PATCH 2/4] uprobes/powerpc: Do not use arch_uprobe_*_step() helpers Oleg Nesterov
2012-10-29 5:33 ` Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli
2012-11-02 5:03 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-28 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2012-11-02 12:51 ` [PATCH 3/4] uprobes/x86: Cleanup the single-stepping code Srikar Dronamraju
2012-10-28 17:39 ` [PATCH 4/4] uprobes: Kill arch_uprobe_enable/disable_step() hooks Oleg Nesterov
2012-11-02 12:50 ` Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121028173931.GA14652@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=anton@redhat.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome